boxing as a sport hasnt evolved

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Manos de Piedra, Aug 18, 2008.


  1. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    It's gone from being the #1 sport in America to barely registering on the sporting map on pages like ESPN. I think it's fair to say it has, but oh well.
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,065
    Mar 21, 2007
    You're talking about popularity now, not the standard of the practitioners. Boxing is in decline as a specticle (though attendances in the UK are on the rise, and last year boxing generated more money than ever). It's certainly less popular, but worse?

    I don't see it that way, I think the last fifteen years is comparable to any fifteen year span in boxing in terms of quality at the top, and I think that the last 8 years isn't hugely inferior to any 8 year period in terms of quality of the very best involved.
     
  3. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    Less popularity leads to lesser following which leads to lesser participation and a smaller talent pool to draw from, which is why I'd say it has declined in that sense, the quality and quantity of top fighters are not what they once were.

    I think if you compared this generation to say, the 40's, there'd be a very marked difference. Jones is the only active fighter(past prime or not) that I can easily put inside my top 50 of all time.
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,065
    Mar 21, 2007

    Well, I don't know that there are a LOT of years where you can "easily" place a fighter in your top 50 (108 years of boxing v 50 slots). Jones is the right now addition and Hopkins is an arguable conclusion (though he just misses out for me).