Boxing Experts and Legends opinion on the fight

Abel Sanchez said he think it was a draw, but during the fight he knew they are losing

 

DLH saw Canelo as the winner by T/KO.

 

A Mere Con would score it for Canelo. It takes some of the sting off his KO loss to Canelo. Now he can say, “Canelo’s a great fighter. He beat me and also beat GGG.”

 

Did anyone not associated with GBP and HBO score it for Canelo?

 

Did Ryan Garcia grin goofily after he swallowed those unborn kids?

 

No one felt Canleo won. Even ESPN Mexcio said its just a draw which tells you everything.

 

Haye can clean the toilets in Canastota as long as he remembers to wear steel toe boots to protect his sensitive pinky toe.

 

I thought the same thing. Maybe his local papers, The Guadalajara Reporter or El Informador scored the fight for Canelo.

 

Boxing had a no decision era where awarding a decision was illegal. This is what it must have felt like.

 

one of these is not like the others LOL

 

Now it's only illegal to give the decision against the home fighter.

 

DLH owns The Ring so it is not a reliable source.

 

Exactly! As late as inbetween rounds going into the 10th, both he and Golovkin looked very worried between every round. Sanchez even quietly slipped in to Golovkin that they were losing, "you got to step it up and knock this guy out."
………..all of this while unexplicably to me Harold Lederman and the HBO team was banking rounds for GGG. LOL!

Harold Lederman is a complete joke and a tool for HBO. He almost everytime scores rounds exclusively to the aggressor whether they are being effective or not.

I thought it was shameful that when Lederman was asked to post his score late in the fight by Jim Lampley, he stated, "I don't know how to score a lot of this rounds Jim, its to close to call, " but then post his scorecard with Golovkin up by several rounds.
This coming from a man with a history of scoring anything resembling close to the fighter going forward.

Harold Lederman is a complete joke!
Harold final tally was 8-4 for Golovkin, what a complete disgrace of a scorecard, and you multiply that tenfold when you know the man has a history of scoring on the side of aggression.