Boxing Has A Chance To Save Itself By Reversing Decision

I think getting no contest from fight Paquaio dominated would be quite unfair to him

 

It's an awful idea.

It would open a door that the sport could never again close. EVERY fighter who thinks he is on the end of a bad decision would be appealing to get decisions reversed, and that could and would quickly erupt into anarchy.

The decision should stand, no matter what.

 

The sport has been in far, far worse shape than this in the past, and it's never died, and never will. It's always been corrupt.
Whatever people's reaction to the decision, it'll blow over in time, and folk will move onto the next hot topic.

In the greater scheme, it's a storm in a teacup.

 

Ehhh... I'll pass.
Decision stands.

 

:good i felt the 115-113 for Brad or Pac was fair...both men did enough to win just one guy can win

Bradley had the HBO bias going against him and his style was not as attractive as Mannys but he took the late part of the fight without question and won at least 1 round early

fight was close

 

it want happen
and it aint smart
they never changed the results of 100's of other fights that went the wrong way and to change this one would **** on all the others.pacman aint no better then the rest, he is not to good to lose or get robbed. the decision stands :good

 

Look at these pac haters. Not one pro fighter and 90% of boxing had it a lopsided affair. In this thread half have Tim winning 7 rds lmao.
Littered wit haterz.

 

I bet my $ and vcash on Bradley, but i gave him the 2 rounds that he won, nothing more nothing less. His sloppy work was far off from coming close to a Victory.

 

it should be called a no-decision

 

It would be good if they reversed or ruled it a no contest, but it does not change the fact it happened in the first place. It shows judges that were commisioned did not know what they were watching or something worse.

 

Most fans had it 9-3 or 8-4 you dummy.

You only find *******s pushing Pacquiao's case. Nobody else thought he won that fight.

JMM 3 was as competitive as Manny Bradley is what I'm saying. There is nobody out there that would agree that it wasn't.

Bradley took 3 rounds with Manny.

Manny took 3 rounds with Marquez.

Marquez dominated Manny in the 3rd fight. Wasn't even close by any means. He put a lesson on Manny and Manny could not answer back with much of anything.

So you dummy, what I'm saying is that if they reverse the Bradley fight and give Manny the win, the Marquez 3 fight should also be reversed as Manny was clearly dominated just as Bradley was.

Nobody, outside of you *******s, thought Marquez 3 was a "close" fight.

So don't come at me with this "well that fight was close" bull**** because it was as close as Bradley Manny, which was about 9-3 in either fight and the rounds in JMM Pac 3 weren't close either *******.

 

The decision of Pac/JMM III? I agree!

JMM is the rightful holder of the 147 belt. Bradley and JMM should fight a title eliminator and Pac can beg to fight the REAL 147 champ!

 

if they reverse this decision...then they better go back and reverse

pac/jmm 2 and pac/jmm 3.

 

This would be absurd. Bradley's team won't sit down and smile, they will put the WBO Commission in trial for non-precedent action towards a recently crowned titlist. It could mean the start of the fall of the WBO which of course would benefit other commissions such as the IBO.

 

Bradley won fair and square. It was a close fight. I thought Pacquiao probbly did more, but not enough to guantree the win. Get over it.