" Boxing is like jazz. The better it is, the less people appreciate it"

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Vic-JofreBRASIL, Feb 17, 2012.


  1. Vic-JofreBRASIL

    Vic-JofreBRASIL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,521
    4,934
    Aug 19, 2010
    " Boxing is like jazz. The better it is, the less people appreciate it. "

    by George Foreman

    Give me your opinion on this statement.......

    It´s a simple but a wonderful quote, and really explains boxing in many ways.....
    Sometimes when I´m watching some boxing fights with friends or something.. someone just say "Aw, this is boring bro....where is the Knockout ??" "I want the ****ing knockout !!"......
    But some people just don´t understand the finesse of the sport.....and Big George just said something briiliant about this.....


    Opinions ??
     
  2. MagnaNasakki

    MagnaNasakki Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,658
    78
    Jan 21, 2006
    Its absolutely true.

    A boring fight is one where punches aren't being thrown.


    As long as each guy is giving atleast 20 or 30 a round, I can find something to like.

    Casual observers also dont understand how GOOD the elite are at this whole boxing scene. Top flight fighters knocking eachother out is rarer and harder to do than they could ever imagine.

    I once asked George Foreman, "If you had the power to end Mike Moorer's night with one right, why wait till the 10th? Why not spare yourself all the punishment and go get him early?"

    George responded, "If it were that easy, trust me, I'd have done it. Landing that one right hand took a lot of work."
     
  3. Surf-Bat

    Surf-Bat Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,736
    97
    Jul 20, 2010
    One name comes to mind- Pernell Whitaker.

    Then again, John Ruiz is boring. The jazz music of his fighting style would consist of a bugle, a kazoo and a cowbell.
     
  4. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    106
    Jun 30, 2008
    It's a fine quote, even with the wee bit O' elitist attitude.
     
  5. Vic-JofreBRASIL

    Vic-JofreBRASIL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,521
    4,934
    Aug 19, 2010
    :yep
     
  6. Vic-JofreBRASIL

    Vic-JofreBRASIL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,521
    4,934
    Aug 19, 2010
    That´s the bottom line......I remember I was watching the Wright vs Hopkins card with a girl who didn´t know nothing about boxing.......and in the undercard Katsidis vs Czar was fighting......and before the fight I told her that Hopkins vs Wright were among the best fighters ever, between the more skilled guys I ever seen......and Katsidis was just a decent rated contender but nothing special......certainly nothing like Hopkins or Winky, and the Czar dude was a jorneyman or something... I didn´t know the guy.......

    Well.....then when Hopkins and Wright were fighting, she just said "Are you saying that white guy wasn´t a better fighter than these two ??" "Because if you are I have no idea what the hell are you talking about !!"..."The australian guy is much better than those two".....

    Perhaps it´s not a good example because the fight Hopkins vs Wright wasn´t really Great in any sense.....but it illustrates what casual fans think....because in that aspect I think boxing is kind of an unique sport......

    And obviously Katsidis vs Czar was a great fight....

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlq4XFMpCCE[/ame]

    By the way.....where are you Red ? I know this quote is something you would appreciate as a fan of the purist scientific defensive boxers......:deal
     
  7. SJS19

    SJS19 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,479
    14
    Jun 13, 2011
    The untrained eye looks to Boxing for violence, anamalistic, barbarian war.

    A Boxing fan accepts the above as part of a sport that is in fact, an art.
     
  8. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,544
    Jul 28, 2004
    As a matter of fact Vic, I'm glad you unearthed this quote:thumbsup...I read that article years ago and was somewhat surprised and impressed by Big George saying that. It's so profound..I don't think Norman Mailer could have said it any better. Great defensive boxing is like that to a tee...another literary quote by somebody went "boxing at it's highest level is like a physical dialogue" or something of that nature..and it is. I certainly prefer the meeting between two artist/technician/defensive specialists, ideally in the past over the 15 round limit because there was this great drama coming up in that no-mans land of the "championship rounds of 13 through 15 that I found to be far more intrigueing and satisfying than even the most thrilling "rock-em sock-em knockout event which ironically, Big George would be more likely to contribute to.
     
  9. Bollox

    Bollox Active Member Full Member

    1,484
    9
    Mar 12, 2010
    Nice analogy and often true. With jazz, the instruments sometimes sound as if they're playing to different tunes at the same time. Same as the game of boxing
     
  10. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,544
    Jul 28, 2004
    George's quote sort of explains the misunderstood Carlos Monzon's place in boxing.
     
  11. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,172
    45,485
    Feb 11, 2005
    John Coltrane, Miles Davis, Benny Goodman and Duke Ellington sold tons of records and all represent the highest expressions of jazz.

    What matters is what is effective, not poetry of movement, not the subtle skills flaunted at the expense of being tagged or exhausting oneself for the duration.

    Give me results. Give me Frank Sinatra and Miles Davis. Sure, I'll listen when you tell me how great Tad Dameron was, and I will agree he was hyper talented. But he didn't have the sustain, the completion of the task at hand like the former protégée's had.
     
  12. Gesta

    Gesta Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,975
    9
    Apr 12, 2009
    True in one way where a lot of skilled are under played or not noticed, but some guys look so good becuease they either are that good, like 80's Tyson getting a lot or quick ko's etc... , but the same Tyson was not that good in the late 90's koing so so oponents.

    A guy like Morales chose to go to war to excite the crowd when he would be better served by boxing.

    Sweet Pea looked great in parts vs Oscar with his eggaserated defence but lost the bout by not throwing enough himself.

    Vlad is one of the best HW's but gets no love becuase of his defenve approch, but has a very high KO rate, I guess that folks want to see trash talking and swinging for the fences.

    Ali won some bouts by playing to the crowd, which served him well.
     
  13. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    It's a truism that subtle things fly over the heads of the masses.

    Having said that, not everything great is subtle.
     
  14. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,544
    Jul 28, 2004

    That's right, because if it was, there would be nothing special about being subtle.
     
  15. The Wanderer

    The Wanderer Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,815
    23
    Mar 28, 2008
    There is certainly an element of truth to it, because to most people, their idea of a good fight is a slugfest. A high level technical match ala Whitaker-McGirt with plenty of punches thrown and an excellent skill level where there is no chance for a KO is not appreciated in the same way.

    That said, it's a fine line too, since a chess match where neither fighter throws a punch because they're sure the other guy is going to counter everything they do and both fighters spend the entire match looking for an opening and positioning is not a good bout either, no matter how high a level the tactics and skill of the fighters may be.