Boxing Monthly SAVAGES Mike Tyson

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by McGrain, Jul 8, 2011.


  1. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,150
    Oct 22, 2006
    Super Middleweight ;)
     
  2. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,558
    Jul 28, 2004
    I stand corrected:D
     
  3. My dinner with Conteh

    My dinner with Conteh Tending Bepi Ros' grave again Full Member

    12,059
    3,562
    Dec 18, 2004
    I don't read Boxing Monthly any more and by looking at that I'm not missing much.
     
  4. groove

    groove Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,056
    26
    May 16, 2006
    tyson was a beast in the 80s - after spinks he was going downhill - slacking in training and ego and other personal troubles. there's not been any heavy since that has been as exciting when a young tyson burst on the scene. saying that i always thought a boxer that could move and keep a left jab in his face could defeat him as buster proved but you had to get past those first few rounds. i do think tyson had a mental flaw when he was put under a lot of pressure. fuk knows what he was doing trying to get his mouthpiece when he should of got straight back up when douglas knocked him down. there will always be that question mark against him.
     
  5. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    Boxing Monthly will fade away many moons before the name Mike Tyson ever will
     
  6. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    you have to rate the champions who knock out their best availible rivals. when tyson came along he knocked them out. won his key fights by KO. Tyson did this, he did clean out the division, he must be a great fighter. What ever happened later he still paid his dues and deserves to be rated for what he did. Tysons resume is deeper than sonny listons record by a long chalk.
     
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,065
    Mar 21, 2007

    It's interesting (though not surprising) that you should chose to needlessly and drag Liston into this thread (again) when almost everything you say:

    "you have to rate the champions who knock out their best availible rivals. when tyson came along he knocked them out. won his key fights by KO. Tyson did this, he did clean out the division, he must be a great fighter. What ever happened later he still paid his dues and deserves to be rated for what he did."

    Also applies to Liston, who are you so consistantly critical of, the major difference being that he took out a fighter better than anyone Tyson ever beat in Patterson and that he was beaten by Muhammad Ali whereas Tyson was beaten by Buster Douglas :lol:
     
  8. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    Tyson would have knocked Patterson out into next week.

    How would Liston do against DOuglas, Holyfield and Lewis?
     
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,065
    Mar 21, 2007
    True.

    "Would have" is never of much interest in these discussions. "Did" is the thing.

    Very, very, very difficult for him to do worse than Tyson. For the record I'd take him over all three. Post prime (as Mike was for Lennox) he would obviously lose.
     
  10. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    Interesting to note that Tyson are Liston are the only 2 guys to have the won lineal title by Ko in the first round.

    As you stated earlier, would have and did are 2 totally different things
     
  11. Foreman Hook

    Foreman Hook ☆☆☆ G$ora ☆☆☆ Full Member

    8,234
    16
    Jul 30, 2010
    XPERT post MCgrain! Tyson KO1 Patterson, but Tyson did never beat any heavyweight as super great as Patterson! Floyd Patterson teh youngest CHAMP, not paper beltholder like Tyson! Liston was a monster beast in 1964 And would KTFO Tokyo Douglas in 2 Rounds!
     
  12. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    when liston came along patterson and ingo were regarded the best heavyweights at that time with machen and foley closely behind. Liston only KO'D patterson and folley and both had been KO'd within the last 2 years by other fighters. machen lasted the distance even though he had been Kod by someone else within the last 2 years also.

    when tyson came along Holmes and spinks were regarded the best two heavyweights, Tyson KOd both. Neither had been KO'd before. Tyson also Kod pinklon thomas, tubbs, biggs and bruno. only bruno had been KOd before.

    I do accept that Tyson and liston had something in common, the versions of micheal spinks and floyd patterson that tyson and liston beat were both awful. Neither performed anywhere close to their potential or recent form against Tyson.
     
  13. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,065
    Mar 21, 2007
    Liston's signature wins are better than Tyson's; Liston's losses, either at prime or after are far, far less embarrassing.
     
  14. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    sitting on a stool? pretending he couldnt get up? oh yes, nothing embarrasing there...:lol:
     
  15. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,065
    Mar 21, 2007
    Biting of a guys ear? Quitting on his stool? Yeah, nothing embarrassing there :lol:

    Now, which of these is worse:

    LKO1, LRTD6 Muhammad Ali (One of the greatest fighters in history, probably the greatest HW)

    OR

    LKO10 James Douglas (Journeyman)
    LK11, DQ3 Evander Holfyield (Past prime ATG HW, never as good as Ali when primed)

    Hmmm?