Boxing: Pacquiao vs Bradley - Judged, Not Measured (ANOTHER MUST WATCH)

Bull****, becuase when Lampley and the rest of HBO is narrating the viewer saying hard left hand by pac and you look at the other video clearly showing that the left hand didnt land or was blocked or was low, well fans and HBO that night were scoring those shots because basically HBO told them to.

 

The TV crews were in on the fix. They cut away everytime Bradleys punches landed, just like the WWE do in the daytime with chairshots.

Bradley dropped Pac in the 6th.

 

this is all nonsense. 48/51 credentialed boxing writers or journalists who were all sitting ringside (IE - not listening to the HBO broadcast) scored it for pac.

the judging in this fight was an atrocity. And the people who are talking like they think Bradley won the fight only started thinking so after the scores were announced.

 

True.

It is crazy to me, no matter how badly one fighter beats another fighter, no matter how obvious you can always find a contingent of fans who will say no you are wrong. Pac could have knocked Bradley down 7 times and these people would still be talking about how the HBO team favored Pac and conspired to make him look like the winner. I would even bet that if the Jones Jr. vs korean dude in the olympics happened just recently, you would have plenty of eastside forum posters claiming the Korean won and the American media was biased.

 

Are you ****ing kidding? "The punch landed on pacquiao's gloves but they were effective" That comment makes you wonder if this guy has ever been to a fight in his life! What a load of ****.

 

Here is what you fail to mention not a single one of those credentialed writers have ever scored as an official. in other words its an un official un trained eye scoring the fight.

 

Funny thing... The first round, which this video is based off of, wasn't even one of the rounds the official judges scored for Bradley anyway. Watching the fight live, and on replay, I scored this round for Pac and marked it as close. I was actually surprised it wasn't one of the rounds they marked for Tim as I thought it was far closer than some they did.

 

First off, I doubt anyone has even done the homework to back that statement up.

But aside from that by your own logic, Letterman, Sen Harry Reid, and the 5 judges later asked to score this by the WBO, are all more qualified to judge this fight than any of those writers, boxers, you, or I am. And every judge asked about this aside from those actually paid on that night all have Pac winning comfortably.

Fact is... Most judges, most boxers, most writers, and most fans you ask, all believe Pac won that fight. Doesn't matter how you try to cut it or spin it.

 

Harlod Lederman works for HBO Pacquiao has a long term contract with HBO
Sen Reid doesnt know a ****ing thing about Boxing, and 5 WBO judges, I mean seriously Boxing has long stood against sanctioning organizations stating that they were bad for the sport and corrupt, so we are to take the opinion of 5 corrupt individuals who work for an Organization that Boxing says they stand against?

 

This is a joke. He comments over and over again on Bradly's defense and how we have to award him for his defense yet I see Bradly missing or having almost all of his punches blocked and he says hardly a word on Manny's defense. He even discounts it.

 

He much like the judges in the fight is looking for reasons to go against the vast majority. Contrarians like to think that they are free independent thinkers. The fact of the matter is that their decision process is more dictated by the will of the mob than just about any other.

 

Man you are really full of **** aren't you?

So Letterman is corrupt. The announcers are corrupt. The 5 WBO judges are corrupt. The HBO crew are all biased or corrupt. Harry Reid (who actually boxed and was an official judge btw) is corrupt. 99% of all boxing writers are dumb asses. 99% of all boxers don't know **** about judging. 92% of all fans don't know ****. Where do you fall in again?

Why not then could the 3 official judges (or 2) have been corrupted instead? Some people made a lot of money on Bradley winning.

 

Ahem

no no no no YES!!!! no no no

 

Look sometimes the judges do actually get a better view of whats going on again HBO and Press Row are all located on the same side of the ring, while the other three judges are all on opposite sides there for the judges being as close as they are and on different sides saw a lot more of what was going on in there than did HBO or the Press.

Thats a fact, do you even know how the press row is set up? I wouldnt take their scores serious they do not have a great view at all. and when you have a south paw in there and his left hand is not on the side your sitting on its hard to see what is really landing and what is not, which is exactly what this Video broke down.

You can not score fights on shots that you didnt see land. HBO mislead viewers such as yourself so they can preserve a Mayweather fight. lets also keep in mind, Lederman endorsed Duane Ford.... just saying

 

Harold Leaderman is corrupt/inept and will go along with his HBO interests (in this fight Pacquiao)

However, Pacquiao did win, not as brutally as the HBO blowjob-fest would have you believe, but he did win.