Boxing Ratings 2004 top 12 P4P

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by JM22, Sep 24, 2008.


  1. jimmie

    jimmie Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,706
    1
    Jul 19, 2004
    Im confused. Is it going into 04 or the end of 04. If its the end of 04 RJJ cant be there because he was KOed twice brutally,Lewis had retired,Tito rapped Mayorga and Mosley lost twice to Wright he cant be so high. If its the start then still Tszyu dont belong he hadnt fought in forever and MAB had recently been killed by Pacquiao where is he at ?
     
  2. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    yea that list would make more sense for early 2003
     
  3. Mind Reader

    Mind Reader J-U-ICE Full Member

    16,769
    32
    Oct 26, 2006
    was Tarver not 10 after having a close fight with Roy?
     
  4. TheH1tMan

    TheH1tMan Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,047
    0
    Jun 23, 2008
    I am not surprised.

    He is not American. Except for Pac, when was the last time a none-American was voted p4p no. 1?
     
  5. Fab2333

    Fab2333 Needs to Get It 2Gether Full Member

    5,359
    2
    Oct 25, 2006
    cant see nothing wrong with that list
     
  6. Sting

    Sting Akagami no Shanks Full Member

    2,998
    0
    Jan 19, 2008
    :deal
     
  7. mexican legend

    mexican legend MVP! Full Member

    17,356
    1
    Jul 19, 2008
  8. Sweet Pea Pacquiao

    Sweet Pea Pacquiao Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,294
    0
    Aug 25, 2004

    The Rankings. Ring? KO? Maxboxing?
     
  9. Kairos

    Kairos Member Full Member

    338
    0
    Aug 20, 2008
    P4P is a stupid rating system because it always gives more credit to the smaller fighters.
     
  10. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    a good p4p list doesn't
     
  11. Kairos

    Kairos Member Full Member

    338
    0
    Aug 20, 2008
    People just assume that guys like Pacquioa would be able to retain their same quickness at every weight division and that's just not true. People are just too stupid to understand that.
     
  12. JM22

    JM22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,487
    5
    Jun 5, 2008
    I got it from a Boxing Magazine De la hoya is in the front page.
     
  13. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    thats not how it works

    What you have to do is compare Pac's quickness to the average lightweight, and then imagine a heavyweight that would have the same quickness advantage compared to the average heavyweight. Do that for all of a fighter's attributes, and you have your p4p matchup.
     
  14. TheH1tMan

    TheH1tMan Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,047
    0
    Jun 23, 2008
    True, but it is a little complex and far too many people are either not aware of this or able to do it.

    I agree that p4p generally sux. But I also agree that a good p4p doesn't - good p4p lists however are hard to come by.