Boxing styles explained

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by janitor, May 11, 2021.


  1. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,553
    Nov 24, 2005
    Wow, did it really call Liston a "brawler" ?
    If it I had to pigeon-hole him into one of the common generic "styles", I would have thought he's the archetypal "boxer-puncher".
     
  2. Bronze Tiger

    Bronze Tiger Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,207
    5,056
    Jun 23, 2018
    I always found it interesting...that whenever you have two brothers that are boxers ...they almost never have the same style ....
     
  3. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,195
    26,470
    Feb 15, 2006
    It's a stance, but in practical terms, it is another style that you have to deal with.
     
  4. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,195
    26,470
    Feb 15, 2006
    In general terms you can.
     
  5. djanders

    djanders Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,065
    6,875
    Feb 21, 2009
    Amen to that question. Anyone who wants to win most of their bets had better take styles to heart. You can call a pressure fighter a swarmer, an inside specialist, or any other term you prefer, but the general style needs to be understood. It's the same for the other styles, call them what you will.

    Do all Pressure fighters fight exactly the same way, or have exactly the same attributes? Of course not. And there are Hybrids, who can change styles somewhat. But the general term still applies. Send any pressure fighter into the ring with prime George Foreman and see what happens to him. George was a top notch slugger/puncher. No pure pressure fighter that I've ever seen would have survived with George.
     
    Bronze Tiger and sasto like this.
  6. djanders

    djanders Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,065
    6,875
    Feb 21, 2009
    I'm sure I'm not the only person on this forum who lived through the Ali, Foreman, Frazier, Norton era. Okay.

    Ali fights Frazier and it's life and death and long brutal fights every time. Ali fights Norton and it's the same, life and death, long, brutal fights.

    Foreman fights Frazier. Foreman beats him almost as soon as the fight starts, or it soon becomes obvious that Frazier has no chance. Foreman fights Norton and it's the same as with Frazier, Bang, Boom, Norton is gone.

    Now comes Ali vs. Foreman. If you lived through that time, you know that most looked at that and very reasonably deduced that Foreman would win rather easily. I bet HEAVILY on Ali and made a lot of money. And why was that?
     
  7. sasto

    sasto Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,534
    16,087
    Aug 5, 2020
    A lot of this theory seems to have been invented to describe what played out between Ali, Foreman, and Frazier. A lot of future boxers learned from them, so it remains relevant sometimes.

    In most fights one boxer is better at everything and will win regardless of style, but in even matchups between archetypal styles it's worth considering.
     
    djanders likes this.
  8. djanders

    djanders Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,065
    6,875
    Feb 21, 2009
    I've been reading the posts, and, hopefully learning. I just want to share some personal thoughts and speculations, in this thread, on styles. I would like to propose the idea that there may be 6 basic styles. I'll list them...

    1. Slugger (Puncher). One Example: George Foreman.
    2. Boxer (Out-fighter). One Example: Muhammad Ali.
    3. Swarmer (In-Fighter). One Example: Joe Frazier.

    4. Boxer-Slugger. One Example: Lennox Lewis.
    5. Boxer-Swarmer. One Example: Evander Holyfield.
    6. Slugger-Swarmer. One Example: Mike Tyson.

    Your thoughts?
     
    Gazelle Punch likes this.