Boxing styles in history

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Jeromearama, Oct 26, 2011.


  1. Jeromearama

    Jeromearama New Member Full Member

    0
    0
    Oct 3, 2010
    I've only been watching boxing for the last few years, and I'm still working though watching all the classics, but I thought I'd ask the classic forum something that's been bothering me for a bit: has there been any identifiable stylistic shifts in the history of boxing, or has it really remained pretty static?

    When you look at the history of a lot of sports you can see big shifts in tactics, style, preferences for particular athletic or technical capabilities, etc, but to my untrained eye there doesn't seem to have been much evolution in boxing other than on the training and nutrition side of things - the basics seem to have remained pretty much the same.

    I'll admit I've never boxed, but I've done a few martial arts, and I wondered if you guys had an opinion on how the technical side of the sport changed, if it did change, with influence from different countries, or different fighting sports and the like. Any instructive recommendations for fights are also much welcomed!
     
  2. jdempsey85

    jdempsey85 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,508
    106
    Apr 23, 2011
    HERE IS A identifiable stylistic shift

    Jack dempsey v Jess willard

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3BTycNuY44[/ame]
     
  3. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    78
    Apr 4, 2010
    The sport began its modern evolution in 1920, when the Walker Law was introduced (the end of the ND era, fights limited to 15 3-minute rounds, the original 8 weight classes were established, roughing tactics banned, doctor in attendance, and the NYSAC became the regulatory commission). So from the 20's until the late 30's and into the 40's the sport came into its own under modern rules and regulations, the techniques evolving to suit the changes.

    Prior to that there was a lot of holding, wrestling, uneven rounds, No Decisions, etc. Just general unsavoury tactics that made the sport a bunch of nonsense to watch (select fighters aside).

    So yeah, if we're not getting into the whole deal with the end of the 15 round era and the sanctioning bodies ruining the competitiveness of the sport over the past 20 years or so (to go along with a lot of other things), it's been basically the same for the past 70 years.
     
  4. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,653
    Dec 31, 2009
    Lots of identifiable stylistic shifts.

    Mostly the shifts are down to the conditions of the equipment, changes in the rules or copycat tricks picked up from other boxers. Boxing is an art as well as a martial art and just like art some things are more in vogue than others. Often equaly effective techniques are dropped from one generation to be replaced by another.

    essentially to the lay man boxing would appear to have always had a fighter v boxer scenario but even the so called clever boxer and brawler would now fall into many sub categories. so many types of boxers and fighters. Box-fighters, pure boxers, defensive spoilers, counter punchers, combination punchers, switch hitters, pressure fighters, southpaws and that’s before you get onto defence and defensive stance like the peek-a-boo, cross arms, half guard and full guard.

    Also to the layman, earlier forms and styles of boxing would appear crude or inferior to current trends but that would be a mistake. Earlier forms of styles were effective and evolved to combat contrasting or similar styles suited to the pace, equipment, rules and distance of boxing contests of the day.

    likewise modern forms of stylistic variants of boxer/fighters still produce great fighters and the styles of fighting will continue to evolve as the conditions continue to change.
     
  5. MagnaNasakki

    MagnaNasakki Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,658
    78
    Jan 21, 2006
    Ali spawned the mobile pure boxer. For a time during and after his career, many, many fighters tried to imitate with mixed results.
     
  6. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    You don't really believe that, do you?
     
  7. sallywinder

    sallywinder Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,926
    5
    May 28, 2008
    MORE EMPHASIS ON DEFENCE IN THE modern era. old time fighters got to the top only after many fights. mostly over 70 fights at least. only the toughest got through. so naturally, many of the fighters were prepared to take one to land one.

    nowdays, fighters get a shot at titles that are so many, its not even countable. they may get a shot after 20 fights or even less. they are still untested, have padded records, and have unproven toughness. this leads to more careful fighters and fights. less excitement as fighters are unwilling to slug it out like many old fighters once did.

    modern fighters look fancy, but put em in a 20 round contest with the old timers, and they would soon sort the modern fighters out.
     
  8. MagnaNasakki

    MagnaNasakki Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,658
    78
    Jan 21, 2006
    The guy who did absolutely nothing but move and dance the entire time? Yes, I do.

    I should clarify the reason imitators generally failed is you need amazing legs and feet for it to be a viable defense. Ali's ascendance put more complete mobile styles like Pep's in the sports backburner, to its detriment.
     
  9. Ylem

    Ylem Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,782
    2
    Nov 3, 2009
    what about tunney?
     
  10. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    68
    Aug 18, 2009
    His heir apparent went 1-1-1 with shot Holyfield and was decapitated by Tua in less than 40 seconds .
     
  11. Terror

    Terror free smoke Full Member

    3,136
    1,500
    Mar 22, 2010
    jajajajajaja.

    I like Dempsey because he was the first guy who solely punched his opponents.
     
  12. Ylem

    Ylem Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,782
    2
    Nov 3, 2009

    huh? what? im refering to his style of the mobile pure boxer that ali copied....but replaced foot work and fundamentals with reflexes.
     
  13. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    68
    Aug 18, 2009
    I referred 2 his style also .
    Prime Ali did not copy Tunney's style , late 1970s Ali possibly did since u mentioned him .
    edit : there is some similarity but Ali used more footwork if anything .
     
  14. Ylem

    Ylem Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,782
    2
    Nov 3, 2009
    right, prime ali had much worse foot work.

    you can clearly see it in the liston fight. every once and a while ali trips up and liston closes to get some hits in.

    if that ali had been fighting dempsey circa 1920 he would have been out in the early rounds.

    he took tunneys style and replaced fundamentals and foot work with reflexs.

    really though you could probably date the style all the way back to corbett, or even charely mitchel
     
  15. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    68
    Aug 18, 2009
    Ali used more footwork that Tunney , Ali "danced" , Tunney was more economical with his footwork . But I really do think Ali did not try 2 imitate him just like u stated here that that style can b traced back even further .
    It takes much less than a genius 4 1 2 invent that style by himself .