Funny, this one guy who isn't into boxing but catches the occasional ppv asked me if I saw the Mayweather/Mosley. He asked me what I thought and said it was cool. He looked at me and said, "It was ****en boring!" I just laughed. I mean I thought it was exciting, and if Mayweather bores people with aggressive performances, then there's no hope for him.
He's trying to get me to say I have no respect for defensive fighters so I hate mayweather out of bias. It's just another bait trick mayweather fans default to when someone calls him less than exciting.
Why would PPV be the only thing to consider? I said "boxing" so I'm not interested in just the American opinion. Boxing is a global sport so it should be judged that way.
U aint **** till u fight in america and get us to care about ur fights.... vald and vitali obviously don't count... Mayweather runs the sport...sorry
So how else can you judge other than PPV? Mayweather/Pacquiao always get shown on TV over here in the UK, the Klits don't, so therefore Mayweather and Pac are clearly 1&2. Fair point?
Pacquiao could pad up his PPV numbers worldwide if the Philippines had PPVs. They telecast his fights there for free. Hatton is a major draw in England yet Brits still have to pay to watch his fights.
Pac aint big in the UK. What makes you think he so big around the world? What are you basing this theory on?:huh
Adamek, Bute could very well be up there in the top 5. Has anyone seen the entrance's for Bute? He's like the Canadian Oscar Delehoya. Plus he has his Romanian fans too.
Hatton is huge I forgot him, I would put him above Manny and Floyd against any decent opposition cos he is LOVED here.