Boxrec Has David Haye #2 ATG Cruiserweight

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Earl-hickey, Feb 4, 2012.


  1. DrMo

    DrMo Team GB Full Member

    22,198
    19
    Jan 29, 2011
    Adamek & Nelson deserve a mention, both good CWs
     
  2. slip&counter

    slip&counter Gimme some X's and O's Full Member

    24,813
    18
    Jul 23, 2008
  3. Scotty321

    Scotty321 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,516
    0
    Dec 21, 2008
    Since his grand total of World title fights at the weight is 2, I think he should no.1 myself.
     
  4. slip&counter

    slip&counter Gimme some X's and O's Full Member

    24,813
    18
    Jul 23, 2008
    James Toney and Virgill Hill also had decent spells at cruiser.
     
  5. slip&counter

    slip&counter Gimme some X's and O's Full Member

    24,813
    18
    Jul 23, 2008
    Anyone remember Amaclet Wamba (spellin)? He was also a decent fighter. Improved as his career went on.
     
  6. DrMo

    DrMo Team GB Full Member

    22,198
    19
    Jan 29, 2011
    Tarver is still highly rated :yep
     
  7. Scotty321

    Scotty321 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,516
    0
    Dec 21, 2008
    Sorry I cannot come to terms with this yet....

    What in the holy mother of Mary and Joseph formula can make Haye no.2. Did they have Enzo and Mormeck as top 5 ATGS?
     
  8. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    52
    Oct 15, 2007
    Carlos De Leon, Johnny Nelson ahead of him imo
     
  9. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    52
    Oct 15, 2007
    yes,
     
  10. Markyboy86

    Markyboy86 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,466
    0
    Nov 6, 2011
    Earl Hickey... The Colinthfc of New Zealand.
     
  11. Tarver could have been a superb cruiser if he'd moved up early enough.

    Hill was a top class fighter, 20 world title wins at 175, though the loss to Hearns looks bad despite Tommy being one of the greatest ever.
     
  12. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    52
    Oct 15, 2007
    that is a tremendous win for Hearns, Hill was a fine boxer
     
  13. Tremendous win for Tommy or bad loss for Hill?

    Or both?
     
  14. Scotty321

    Scotty321 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,516
    0
    Dec 21, 2008
    Evander beat the man to be the man:thumbsup

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbN-mWON6Ug[/ame]
     
  15. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    52
    Oct 15, 2007
    I actually think it's more of the former. On a strictly technical assessment of what happened you can look at it on the surface of things and take from it that during his 175 pound campaign he effectively just has a win over Hill and a loss to Barkley. But that doesn't tell the whole story in terms of the quality of fighter that Hill lost to. Hearns was still a world class operator at that time, and that's to say the least. You could call it a bad loss for Hill, but I would maintain that is more so a great win for Hearns than it was a bad loss for Hill. I always saw it as Hearns' last stand really.