BOXREC: Pacquiao is now #2 p4p ; Hatton still #2 at 140

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by asero, May 3, 2009.


Page 1 of 2
  1. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,373
    309
    Jan 8, 2009
    pacquiao is now #2 p4p behind hopkins ; Hatton still #2 at 140
     
    asero, May 3, 2009
    asero, May 3, 2009
    #1
  2. BritInvasion

    BritInvasion keepin on keepin on Full Member

    763
    28
    May 7, 2008
    Not too shocked to see Hatton remain as 140 #2? Its not that much of a leap.
     
    BritInvasion, May 3, 2009
    BritInvasion, May 3, 2009
    #2
  3. theHawtness

    theHawtness Active Member Full Member

    1,321
    0
    Apr 2, 2007
    huh?
     
    theHawtness, May 3, 2009
    theHawtness, May 3, 2009
    #3
  4. Akatsuki

    Akatsuki New Member Full Member

    84
    0
    Apr 13, 2008
    Pac is close to retiring and still not #1 on Boxrec's P4P.
     
    Akatsuki, May 3, 2009
    Akatsuki, May 3, 2009
    #4
  5. treva1977

    treva1977 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,784
    3
    May 23, 2008
    hatton is the next best fighter at 140 but i am amazed by how much the margin is between 1 and 2.lol.
    ​
     
    treva1977, May 3, 2009
    treva1977, May 3, 2009
    #5
  6. Dan684

    Dan684 Dave's Stepdad Full Member

    17,612
    3
    Feb 19, 2009
    Yeah wouldn't really wory about boxrec. They had Pac #1 at 140 abot 2 months ago. Not saying they weren't right (Eventually) but they cant put that before he's had one fight there ???
     
    Dan684, May 3, 2009
    Dan684, May 3, 2009
    #6
  7. pehun

    pehun Member Full Member

    462
    2
    Mar 19, 2009
    If the fight takes place against Money Mayweather (if he beats Marquez), and if he wins, no doubt he'll become #1 P4P.

    Yeah, a lot of "if".
     
    pehun, May 3, 2009
    pehun, May 3, 2009
    #7
  8. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,373
    309
    Jan 8, 2009
    yet paul williams is not ranked as a middleweight..
     
    asero, May 3, 2009
    asero, May 3, 2009
    #8
  9. Monstar

    Monstar The Future.. Full Member

    11,166
    0
    Oct 10, 2007
    **** boxrec.....
     
    Monstar, May 3, 2009
    Monstar, May 3, 2009
    #9
  10. manbearpig

    manbearpig A Scottish Noob Full Member

    3,255
    134
    Feb 6, 2009
    Boxrec is ridiculous at times.
     
    manbearpig, May 3, 2009
    manbearpig, May 3, 2009
    #10
  11. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,373
    309
    Jan 8, 2009

    i would still rank hatton over bradley
     
    asero, May 3, 2009
    asero, May 3, 2009
    #11
  12. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    boxrec has **** "computerized" ranking.
     
    puga_ni_nana, May 3, 2009
    puga_ni_nana, May 3, 2009
    #12
  13. nobius

    nobius 4th hokage Full Member

    872
    0
    Dec 9, 2008

    If you say so...
     
    nobius, May 3, 2009
    nobius, May 3, 2009
    #13
  14. doomeddisciple

    doomeddisciple Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,001
    8
    Jul 19, 2004
    Again with the lists....Asero - Do you only listen to music if it's on the charts?
     
    doomeddisciple, May 3, 2009
    doomeddisciple, May 3, 2009
    #14
  15. djm

    djm Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,208
    2
    Dec 17, 2006
    Threads on boxrec rankings should be removed immediately. They, like the rankings, serve no purpose.

    Whatever their algorithm is, it sucks. Everyone knows that. Leave it be.
     
    djm, May 3, 2009
    djm, May 3, 2009
    #15
Page 1 of 2