Boxrec's P4P

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Miles5149, Mar 25, 2008.


  1. sues2nd

    sues2nd Fading into Bolivian... Full Member

    9,760
    8
    Aug 7, 2004
    Any sentance that begins with "Boxrec's p4p list" should always end with "is full of ****".
     
  2. DanePugilist

    DanePugilist God vs God - Death Angel Full Member

    6,837
    2
    Oct 14, 2006
    :lol: :lol: - seemingly so - with some boxers added.
     
  3. bmf95b

    bmf95b Boxing Fan Full Member

    5,268
    11
    Jan 9, 2007
    Wladimir #9.....BUYA
     
  4. rreed23

    rreed23 aka Gordon Gekko Full Member

    1,874
    0
    Nov 23, 2007
    He should be #5
     
  5. Vantage_West

    Vantage_West ヒップホップ·プロデューサー Full Member

    20,834
    608
    Jul 11, 2006
    :good

    i do think we should have have them they add an extra order to the sport. after winning a title the only way to be the best man is to become the best fighter in the sport.

    but yeah people basing there views on P4p lists is stupid.

    you could take the whole top 10 write them on a bit of card each. throw them all in the air pick them up in any order...and you still have a good list
     
  6. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    Boxrec have never had Cotto on a top 25 list, I'm pretty sure of that.

    For instance, looking at British fighters, I doubt anyone would have David Haye above either Hatton or Calzaghe - certainly in front of the likes of Witter and Woods, but not those two!

    Hopkins No.1?

    Probably the most ludicrous suggestion of the year.
     
  7. robpalmer135

    robpalmer135 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,342
    0
    Jun 29, 2007
    they correct thatlist all the time.
     
  8. Vantage_West

    Vantage_West ヒップホップ·プロデューサー Full Member

    20,834
    608
    Jul 11, 2006
    computers dont recognise skills only stats.

    a bit biased i feel but hey.
     
  9. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    Maybe so mate, but I wish they would ****ing try thinking whilst doing so :rofl
     
  10. BewareofDawg

    BewareofDawg P4P Champ Full Member

    27,677
    184
    Apr 8, 2006
    "Ok guys lets do it alphabetically today..."

    "yup, that looks good!" :rofl
     
  11. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    but they have winky who lost to bernard and beat an anciest ike quartey, drawed against jermain.....
     
  12. BewareofDawg

    BewareofDawg P4P Champ Full Member

    27,677
    184
    Apr 8, 2006
    Winky is still P4P above Hops and he beat Jermain. Ike looked pretty damn good against Forrest so he's far from ancient.

    But otherwise, another great post from you :patsch
     
  13. D_knowsboxing

    D_knowsboxing The King is back Full Member

    1,971
    1
    Feb 4, 2008
    This is all a ploy to exaggerate a victory for calz IF he beats Bhop. Then all the brits can say that Calz has beat the #1 P4P fighter according to boxrec. Obviously NO ONE considers Bhop #1, Mayweather has held that crown for sometime now. Hell, I don't think that Bhop will even be in the top 3 P4P if he slaughters Calzaghe. Shameless, but business as usual for our allies....
     
  14. saul_ir34

    saul_ir34 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,549
    0
    May 6, 2007
    1, 2, 3, i think might fly. Hopkins has beaten top guys after top guys and in my opinion has taken more risks than PBF. PBF is ok at 2. Vasquez has punched his way into 3 due to his 3 FOTY candidates in his last 3 fights. 4 should be Pac i think followed by JMM at 5. No clear winner in their fight so i cant drop JMM too much.
    Pavlik should be around 10 or so. Rafa should be a little past 10. Winky should not be top ten. He is far too inactive and his loss to Hopkins moves him down.
    Hatton should just retire or fight real competition.
    Mijares should be top 10.

    Where the hell is Cotto??
     
  15. thespecialone

    thespecialone Active Member Full Member

    1,008
    0
    Mar 16, 2008
    My god a conspiracy! I don't think that's anything at all to do with it, it's just done by computer thereore will never give an accurate reading to someones skill level in fact it ruins the whole concept of being p4p. I can't believe Cotto ain't in there.