Lol. I remember lots of people were saying before that hatton will trouble pac because of his ugly style.. Bradley wouldnt be able to rough up pac. He will get koed for his trouble. But definitely tim has a better chance of winning compared to cotto against may.
Bradley is a slick, black, african-american fighter. He's also undefeated, and in his absolute prime. He's a hungry young lion. If he can't beat pac, then no one will because he has all the attributes of a monster... Well said So Pac KOe's him inside 8rounds :hey
Hatton leaves his face exposed. I wasn't on here at the time but I knew Manny would KO him. I didn't think it would be that soon though. Bradley has a tight defense and won't take to many flush shots when he comes in.
Effective means stopping ur oppenent in his tracks or making his head snap back, If "effective" meant "hurt" Margarito would be undefeated and paulie Malignaggie would have never won a fight in his life. Effective is having an effect, not necessarily hurting your opponent. Let's say Pacquiao starts a 6 punch combination, and Bradley lands a jab That effectively stops Pacquiao from unloading, that would be considered an effective punch.
Bradley WILL NEVER BE A CASH COW. His style is nauseating and will easily put you to sleep. Plus he has no oomph in his punches. Guys like him, Ward, Bhop are just awful to watch. Mayweather is actually more entertaining than them.
It's possible. I said in another thread that Arum won't let anyone beat his boy by decisions. His stock markets will go to hell if he does.
I like Bradley's chance here TBH. And it is due to Pacquaio's sliding performance more than Bradley's qualities, though Bradley has the tools to beat him, if properly used in a good gameplan. Pacquaio has proven once more he can not adjust well in a fight, if his speed and power combination is being neutralized. Instead, he gets frustrated and just tries to challenge his foe for a brawl. Cotto, Hatton and Margarito fell victim to that challenge. Clottey was an unwilling opponent, and showed Pacquaio's minor flaw as an offensive fighter, eventhough he shut him down in the scorecards: he could not crack him up. Ditto Mosley and Marquez. Especially Marquez who gave him a severe boxing lesson in spacing, movement and counterpunching. Marquez set the same traps in almost every moment of their fight and Pacquaio was just too easy to eat the bait, without inflicting any serious damage to Marquez. Bradley, IMO, has a good fundamental, stays on his game plan, and won't allow himself to engage in a brawl. I think he is mentally tough and ready to win whatever it takes. He is confident. He will box well, and has the athleticism and chin to match Pac's blinding speed and power. He is also physical and probably will rough Pac to his advantage. This is a difficult fight for Pac at this stage. He can not be confident (same with his fans) that he will steamroll Bradley with ease because his last two fights has shown he is no longer that dominant force if faced with a skilled boxer with a right strategy. I'd favor Pacquiao but if the bookies give a Bradley win crazy amount of money, I'll take Bradley anytime.
bradley rides the bike, headbutt here and there...potshot for the win... pac gets frustrated against runners or "boxers" if you will....
These are pro boxers. If Bradley is hitting him clean and it isnt effective it just shows how much peds Pac is juicing on.