Bradley calling out Khan: who wins?

So many are over rating Khan's chin and boxing ability yet again.

 

This isn't history; this is you speculating and smearing. Peterson is a proven drugs cheat; Khan is not.

 

no he just hires the dodgiest ped provider ever who knows how to mask the traces

you know the saying cant beat them join them


anyone see khan claiming he is cleaning up the sport :rofl OLYIMPIC style testing i do OLYIMPIC standards

at the unfair point deduction he was warned countless times and not just in this fight

 

This is actually a really interesting fight

Bradders don't have much pap, and against someone with the lightning speed of Khan that's not good news

I go with Khan UD

 

Slander and slur. Let's stick to facts, eh? Peterson has been caught red handed; whereas Khan is clean.

Those points (there were two) were decisive: Khan would have won the cards without them. No one likes to see close, hard fought championship fights decided by point deductions, especially when they are controversial. When did you last come across a boxer penalised for pushing? I have been watching boxing for some 25 years and i have never seen it before. And that fight there were two, and that second point deduction in the final round, which tipped the balance of the fight for Peterson, came without a warning. Peterson never got point deductions for use of the low head. Pi$$ poor refereeing.

But my overall point is that the Peterson fight should not be used as a yardstick for how to beat Khan. The PED use and, at best, questionable point deductions give a misleading picture. Without those things, it would be a Khan win.

 

you mean like khan slanders and slurs brooks name
, yeah although i find slander and slur funny facts are facts and khan lost to peterson fact :deal

you see how you khan fans excpet double standards , whats good for one is good for the other

it would it could it should :-verysad denial is a *****

 

Them deductions arnt normally called though brook could have had a few against porter

 

I think it would be a fight that could go either way. Some people will think Khan won, some will think Bradley won but I think Khan will get the win officially.

 

what for holding :rofl oh the joys a khan fan going on about holding


khans best attributes pulling the head down , pantomime horse position , leaning on the back of an opponents neck , pushing , look at the ref for help after getting hit , running in the opposite direction and when i say running i mean running with his back turned ,
now tell me why brook should have had apoint taken not that it was that close for it to make any differance :bart

 

Bradley doesn't have the power to hurt Khan, which makes this fight automatically favor Khan in my personal opinion. As long as Khan's opponent lacks power to stop him in his tracks he will be comfortable enough to use his speed to the maximum.

 

The only fights were he did a lot of that were Peterson and collazo and he was deducted against porter brook held the entire fight without interference from the ref

 

Plus it was a split decision so it was close

 

To me personally, I thought Porter deserved the win. He was the champion yet fought as the challenger and was making the fight all night.

 

nope

 

Your wrong kid