Bradley face seemed clear after the fight, clearly didn't lose

word

 

neither of you are above 18 years of age

 

Obviously a joke thread, I am going to hi-jack and say this.
That was a close close fight. I simply do not believe the compubox numbers at all.
Hard to score because Bradleys punches seemed pretty innefective but they were still landing. He also kept throwing range finders that would slap the arms and combo's off the arms but some getting through. Pacquiao was very effective striking but I would say landing less generally. Ledermans scorecard was outrageous. Laughable. And the HBO commentary team need to learn to be impartial. They weren't.

 

Grow up, please.

 

I wasn't aware that fights were now judged on what each fighter's face looks like after a fight.

 

So I was wondering how Pacquiao's face fared compared to Bradley, in terms of physical damage, NOT emotional damage...

 

Well if you judge it like *******s did the JMM III, judges opinions and post fight pictures prove who won the fight.

 

Where are all the guys with the pictures of JMM's face after the last Pacquiao fight, trying to prove Pac won?

Oh no wait, this doesn't count because black fighters don't swell, right? atsch


*******s are a disgrace to boxing.

 

Excellent post. Very close fight. I would have been happy with Pac winning close, a draw, or Bradley winning close.

Can't argue with what the judges saw. Bradley won fair and square.

 

That's about as well as it could be said. :good

 

tell that to the *******s who post jmm and mannys faces after their 3rd fight to try to prove who won