Bradley-Guzman rejected by WBO?!?!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by ky7le, May 21, 2009.

  1. ky7le

    ky7le Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2008
    Messages:
    252
    Likes Received:
    0
    The WBO rejected the fight because Guzman isn't ranked in the top 15 at 140 by the WBO...He is 11 at 135. Source: The Scene

    Bunch of BS!
     
  2. onepunch.net

    onepunch.net Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2007
    Messages:
    1,314
    Likes Received:
    0

    Youre mad because a sanctioning body actually FOLLOWED THE RULES??

    I find that curious...........
     
  3. unclepaulie

    unclepaulie Run like an antelope! Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2007
    Messages:
    6,002
    Likes Received:
    1
    It's surprising considering he's held WBO belts before.
     
  4. Pound4poundx

    Pound4poundx Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2008
    Messages:
    2,292
    Likes Received:
    0
    Who cares if he's not ranked in the top 15? Guzman is one of the best pure boxers in the game today and he's undefeated.
     
  5. Vengeance

    Vengeance Certified Headhunter Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2009
    Messages:
    1,820
    Likes Received:
    0
    To hell with Guzman. Glad to see him get ****ed over just like he ****s over the fans.
     
  6. FromWithin

    FromWithin Living for the city Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2008
    Messages:
    2,538
    Likes Received:
    1
    I tought you had the right to defend against ranked boxers in 3 weight classes (the champion's, the one up and one down.)
     
  7. onepunch.net

    onepunch.net Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2007
    Messages:
    1,314
    Likes Received:
    0
    uhmmmm, no.
     
  8. unclepaulie

    unclepaulie Run like an antelope! Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2007
    Messages:
    6,002
    Likes Received:
    1
    If only...

    :lol:
     
  9. NickBarker

    NickBarker Damnum Absque Injuria Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2007
    Messages:
    2,554
    Likes Received:
    1
    It's annoying insofar as alphabet organizations normally bend over backwards to cater to those who curry favor with them, often times to the detriment of worthy challengers, e.g., the WBA's continual propping up of John Ruiz. This time, there was an intriguing bout between a quality 140 pounder and a dynamic, smaller fighter, but it will likely not take place because Bradley is concerned about keeping a belt that has no legitimate value.
     
  10. onepunch.net

    onepunch.net Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2007
    Messages:
    1,314
    Likes Received:
    0
    just because it has no value to YOU doesnt mean it has no value to Timmy Bradley. Obviously it does.
     
  11. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    86,106
    Likes Received:
    4,098
    Boxing Orgs are destroying boxing.
     
  12. unclepaulie

    unclepaulie Run like an antelope! Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2007
    Messages:
    6,002
    Likes Received:
    1

    No ****. How about some props to Tim for taking another tough fight against one of the best pure boxers in the sport, to prove himself like he has since he was on ShoBox? How about that???
     
  13. NickBarker

    NickBarker Damnum Absque Injuria Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2007
    Messages:
    2,554
    Likes Received:
    1
    Of course, that's why I said "legitimate" value; I'm speaking from my own admittedly subjective viewpoint. There are seemingly a couple of options here as to why it would be valuable, though. One, Bradley believes that having one of four titles from sanctioning organizations that all have scandalous dealings in the very recent past is of primary importance. If that is what he values over recognition from the media and incorrupt bodies, then there is nothing I can say except that I find it foolish. Two, there is an economic value derived from being able to claim that one is a "world champion" even though the term is so diluted it hardly means anything today. If that is the case, I do not begrudge the man for trying to ensure his income remains as high as possible, but please don't expect me to countenance with approbation when it spoils a fight I'd like to see.
     
  14. Soriano

    Soriano Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2008
    Messages:
    4,949
    Likes Received:
    0
    Maybe or maybe not. We are talking about lightwelterweight. He has not even fought once in this division, why should he be given a crack at the title?
     
  15. Leif Erikson

    Leif Erikson Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2004
    Messages:
    2,564
    Likes Received:
    120
    Just look at what the WBO did for the likes of Calzaghe. I think Tocker Pudwill was one of those who mysteriously turned up in the top 15.

    Bradley should dump this useless title.