Bradley has been getting a little overrated.

Dead on.

 

I agree - everyone who's undefeated is going to be overrated - but he is tough as hell, very skilled, and is improving. I like him in a fight vs. Khan as well.

 

Exactly, how is Bradley overrated? From all the P4P lists I have seen very few times I see him in the top 10. Right now he is probably around the 15 to 20 area which is probably where he should be. Bradley isn't overrated. Hell, if anything he is starting to become underrated based on all the overrated threads that start every day.

 

Holt would have knocked Kahn out. And Peterson was undefeated and in my opinion would have beaten Alexander. I think Kahn is the one who is overrated. I think Bradley's skills and underrated and I think Alexander's skills are completely unknown because he hasn't really proven himself by beating anyone of note.


Bradley has been taking on tough competition and beating them regularly. No one else at 140 can say that.


Lets look at the records

Lamont Peterson 139 27-0-0


Nate Campbell 138½ 33-5-1


Kendall Holt 139¾ 25-2-0


Edner Cherry 139¼ 24-5-2



Junior Witter 139¼ 36-1-2



Miguel Vazquez 139½ 18-1-0


Donald Camarena 143 18-3-0


Nasser Athumani 137½ 20-3-1


Manuel Garnica 140 23-6-0


I don't care what any of you say. There are no easy fighters with 20+ wins and less than 6 defeats. When you are beating guys with this kind of win loss ratio on a regular basis there is no question that you are the most skilled in the division. I'd go so far as to say Bradley is one of the most skilled pound for pound.

Sure Pacquiao is beating guys with records like this, and Mayweather, but thats about it.