Bradley/Holt could have been a draw.

He was landing clean effective punches in every round.

 

Bradley, by and large, fouled the **** out of him for most of the fight.

 

Bradley's fould were by and large accidental; Holt's were pretty clearly intentional.

 

And there were several rounds where Bradley wasn't landing any clean effective punches. Holt was the effective counter puncher tonight. It's obvious the judges preferred the ineffective aggressiveness of Bradley though. Bradley had his moments to the Body, but that was it. Holt scored two KD's, had much better work upstairs, and his jab was also better. So, in terms of punching, Kendall was more effective 3-1. Where was Bradley's jab? Where were Bradley's head shots? People criticize Holt for not being active enough well I criticize him for not landing enough. Bradley did not land enough to win this fight.

 

LOL! Whatever man. I think your head has been stuck in that tree too long.

 

This goes to your obvious bias. The fight was close.

 

He did. I'm not trying to knock him or anything, and everytime there was a foul I noticed the fighters touched gloves like gentlemen, but it looked to me like there were a few shots where Kendall had Bradley's nuts square in his sights when he pulled the trigger, whereas the headbutts looked more like Bradley, a shorter fighter, trying to move inside to work on the body, where he was having his best success.

 

Outworked how??? By just coming forward throwing ineffective shots that weren't landing???? Where was Bradley's jab? Where were his head shots? He did good bodywork for some of the fight, that's it. You say Holt was being outworked but punches not landed are just that. Holt was doing enough clean power punching and jabbing to nullify the supposed Bradley onslaught.

 

Holt scored TWO KD's.

Holt had the better jab

Holt was the more effective puncher

Holt landed the better power shots.