Bradley: "Judges watched Fight, Everyone else watched Pacquiao."

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Smokin' Joe, Jun 15, 2012.


  1. HeavyPuncha

    HeavyPuncha Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,805
    15
    May 20, 2012
    95% of fans here who said Bradley are Floyd nuthugger. Go figure.
     
  2. Smokin' Joe

    Smokin' Joe ~ Dinamita Irlandés ~ banned

    12,229
    4
    Dec 12, 2010

    Extremely biased video? Pacquiao missing over and over, it's right in there in the video for all to see. But you wouldn't know because you didn't watch more than a minute or two. Again, I'm not saying Bradley won. But anyone with a scorecard like Lederman's (One round to Bradley) need to choose a different sport to watch. Bradley is a good operator.
     
  3. The Akbar One

    The Akbar One Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    15,541
    5,275
    Dec 1, 2007
    No you couldn't, and stop being so butthole sore. It was about time the judges got one right. We saw why Bob Arum kept him away from Juan Guzman, and Zahir Raheem at the lighter weights.
     
  4. Porgeous Porge

    Porgeous Porge Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,452
    1
    May 22, 2012
    agreed, i dont think the video is saying Bradley won, i think its just purely pointing out how bad HBO was that night

    it does this by showing Bradleys good moments and showing Pac's struggles but the vid doesnt say Bradley won it just points out how bad the HBO crew called it and scored it
     
  5. The Akbar One

    The Akbar One Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    15,541
    5,275
    Dec 1, 2007
    I agree, it was more pointing out HBO's not so subliminal bias, which HBO has a long history of. I only wish that Bradley was a hard concussive puncher, so that his win would have been more conclusive.
     
  6. prelude

    prelude Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,924
    7
    Nov 12, 2010
    The judge: I scored the first 6 rounds for Pacquiao. I gave Bradley 7 rounds because the old PAC would have finished Bradley :lol:.

    I didn't know that there were 13 rounds in a boxing match. And I didn't know that you couldn't score for a fighter because he no longer is knocking out his opponent :lol:.
     
  7. Knives7

    Knives7 Boxing Addict banned

    7,196
    1
    Jan 24, 2009

    It all make sense now!!! A video that shows 3-5 seconds per round where Pacquiao misses! There was no robbery. :deal
     
  8. Dipset

    Dipset Dipset4Ever Full Member

    3,325
    1
    Jun 29, 2010
    Bradley is the best...
     
  9. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    28,160
    32
    Apr 14, 2007
    it's always funny when the 1 person out of 10 tells everybody he's right and they're wrong...what makes it more funny is when he is serious about it.
     
  10. ThaWiseJester

    ThaWiseJester Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,401
    1
    Mar 28, 2009
    Very true,the announcers were cheer leaders for Pac,a 2nd fight will look like the end of the match where Bradley had figured him out,and Pac knows this..
     
  11. HawkFan16

    HawkFan16 Unshot/In My Prime Full Member

    3,511
    3
    Jun 16, 2008
    Smokin' Joe spamming that video over and over makes him look like one of those guys arguing Obama wasn't actually born in the US. He was, and posting a biased video over and over doesn't change that fact at all. Pacquiao won 7 clear rounds, Bradley won 1 clear round, and there are 4 semi-close rounds that could be scored in either direction if you tried hard to do so. The best conceivable card you can get for Bradley is 7-5 Manny, and that's cutting Bradley every conceivable break that you can. The "Bradley Won" crowd is the new tinfoil hat group in boxing.
     
  12. dangerousity

    dangerousity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,253
    2,301
    Jan 4, 2005
    Not even butthurt about it, the overwhelming majority thought Pac won the fight clearly. You dont need a bias video crying about HBO to prove that.

    Go look at interviews with just about every fight and boxing personality out there, 98% of them will say Pac won clearly. Are you guys seeing something their not? Even Bradley thought he didnt win the fight, that says enough. Atlas known as Pac hater was disgusted and called it robbery. Mayweathers called it a robbery. JMM called it a robbery. MAB called it a robbery. Holyfield, Brewster, heck even Lewis compares it to his own robbery vs Holyfield. How do you explain that? Cant think of anyone credible who scored it for Bradley, including Bradley himself. Just a bunch of ***s on a forum trying to rationalise something that cant. Oh, HBO was bias.

    Quit watching boxing, serious, you gotta be blind. That was clear as day.
     
  13. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    Smokin' joe the poster is a joke. he's one of those crying in every thread of robbery when marquez didn't get the decision when most saw it as a close fight but here he is trying to justify the bradley robbery when most didn't saw it close at all with pac winning for the 95% of the boxing fans.
     
  14. Dorfmeister

    Dorfmeister Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,558
    6
    Aug 8, 2007
    Bradley is becoming an annoying little ***** who got his prize in standing up in robbery of the year and still doesn't STFU. I C Bradley losing his unbeaten record right after his 1st title defense against Peterson who is another rat in the kitchen of their sinking lil boat.
     
  15. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,686
    Sep 8, 2010
    I scored it 9-3 Pacquiao.

    However, you can't have it both ways. Pac either lost to JMM and beat Bradley, or beat JMM and lost to Bradley. Be consistent.

    No way.

    Rios/Abril was ROTY.