Bradley needs to KO Pacquiao

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Nopporn, Apr 6, 2014.


  1. Nopporn

    Nopporn Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,267
    1,737
    Jan 4, 2007
    The last time Pacquiao was robbed but this time it's Bradley who's gonna get robbed. He needs to KO Pacquiao to ends those controversies and to show the world that he's really better than Pacquiao.

    We all know that Bob Arum can take those judges to the most expensive resturant and hotel if they want. He will treat them like a king. :D
     
  2. ValentinePrince

    ValentinePrince Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,869
    32
    Nov 21, 2013
    I actually agree with you that Brad'll probably have an unjustly hard time with the judges in the rematch.

    I think because of the controversy of the scoring the first fight there will be a kind of "reverse-prejudice" in favour of Pacquiao.

    It'd not be the first time something like this happens. Barrera unjustly got a UD against Morales in their second fight and perhaps due to the controversy surrounded the misscoring of the first this overly sensitized the judges to score in Barrera's favour.

    The second LL-Holyfield fight was scored wide to LL even though it was actually closer than their first.
     
  3. Holy Grail

    Holy Grail Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,055
    52
    Sep 13, 2013
    Bradley is the one who signed the TR extension moron
    Arum wants Bradley to become the TR star as Pac is on his way out
     
  4. Nopporn

    Nopporn Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,267
    1,737
    Jan 4, 2007
    It's not gonna be easy to KO Pacquiao since Bradley is not a big puncher, but his chin is not the same as it was so Bradley has a chance.

    BTW, Arum wants to make Pacquiao v.s. Bradley to be many versions like Pacquiao v.s. JMM.
     
  5. miniq

    miniq AJ IS A BODYBUILDING BUM Full Member

    47,857
    27,809
    Oct 23, 2011
    Bradley CANNOT KO Pac
     
  6. lester proctor

    lester proctor Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,393
    1
    Jul 2, 2011
    I doubt it. The jmm fights are a lot more marketable cause Jmm is Mexican and they make for great evenly matched fights. Viewer satisfaction was not high for the first Bradley fight irrespective of the robbery
     
  7. Nopporn

    Nopporn Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,267
    1,737
    Jan 4, 2007
    And if Pacquiao beats Bradley convincingly or knocks him out in the rematch then? The one who's on his way out is Bradley, isn't it?

    The outcome of the rematch is very significant for both fighters though.
     
  8. 6'4south

    6'4south Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,943
    81
    Apr 2, 2012
    Kind of agree Bradley has to win in a very impressive fashion due too the controversial outcome of the last fight, however, he only has to look impressive enough to create an impression that he won, even if Pacquiao gets the decision.
     
  9. Nopporn

    Nopporn Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,267
    1,737
    Jan 4, 2007
    If the fight is close again, Pac will get the nod this time. In fact, I didn't really think that their last fight was a robbery. It was a close fight that could have gone either way. If I were the judge I would give Pac 115 - 113.
     
  10. HitBattousai

    HitBattousai Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,076
    11
    May 6, 2006
    I'm not going to say Bradley has to stop Pacquiao, but he's got to win the rounds very convincingly. A gameplan like the JMM fight probably won't cut it with the backlash over the first fight's decision. Doubtful he can win convincingly enough in any case.
     
  11. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    8
    Jul 25, 2008
    I do think Bradley can do great and get Robbed, no doubt in my mind
     
  12. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    8
    Jul 25, 2008
    Good Card
     
  13. 6'4south

    6'4south Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,943
    81
    Apr 2, 2012
    @Nopporn

    I agree, what I'm saying is Bradley just has to do well enough to create what could be considered another controversial decision, that may go in favor of Pacquiao. Sure you'll have people say Bradley actual deserved this victory, but Pacquiao, by virtue of what I and many others think was a bad decision, should have got the nod. This sets the stage for a possible 3rd matchup, if this hypothetical situation does play itself out. Of course a KO either way probably ends any possibility of a 3rd fight.
     
  14. 6'4south

    6'4south Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,943
    81
    Apr 2, 2012
    @Nopporn

    I agree, what I'm saying is Bradley just has to do well enough to create what could be considered another controversial decision, that may go in favor of Pacquiao. Sure you'll have people say Bradley actual deserved this victory, but Pacquiao, by virtue of what I and many others think was a bad decision, should have got the decision (i know this type of thinking sucks but thats what boxing has become, in many cases).This sets the stage for a possible 3rd matchup, if this hypothetical situation does play itself out. Of course a KO either way probably ends any possibility of a 3rd fight.
     
  15. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    If Bradley trades with Pac he will get knocked out..................two of the judges from the first fight resigned after the fight.............