Bradley now out of boxrec's P4P top 100

They also don't have Roman Gonzalez in their top 25 P4P. Their opinion sucks.

 

Bradley being #3 p4p was a disgrace and a joke. Either way his ranking as #9 for ww might be a tad low, but he's not a top 5.

 

The scoring method doesn't get influenced by anything but sheer numbers and results. So when he "beat" Pac, Provo and JMM he was the man, and now he has "drawn" with Chaves after Pac set the record straight he's pretty average. It's pretty flawed that way. :yep

 

Weight also matter to boxrec. It why no Gonzalez. Little men get ignored.

 

Its not really an opinion thing.

Its run off an algorithm, which apparently isnt exactly fool proof.

 

Don't follow BoxRec P4P Rankings. What happened to Pac in 2012? Did he become an unranked Welter?



:think

 

Why was it joke please share ?

 

I'm sure that when he finds a moment to put Floyd's weiner down and come up for some air, he'll have a BS answer for you.

:rofl

 

So officially he's 3-1-1 at welter, when in reality he's 2-2-1.

 

Bradley being p4p #3 was a joke because we all saw him lose to Pac. My scorecard wasnt even close, and Id guess a vast majority of boxing fans feel that way. Yes he did beat JMM afterwards but that alone wont get you that ranking.

Not saying you, but Pac fans cant have it both ways. At first they said Pac was robbed blind, and when Pac wins the rematch they talk about Pac beating a p4p #3 like it was such an accomplishment.

 

Surely it's 4-1 "in reality"? OR 3-2?

 

I agree with the highlighted part. His P4P rank is debatable so I won't touch that.

 

Bradley being P4P #3 was justified because he CLEARLY beat, and at times made it look easy, a rampaging, doped up JMM coming off one of the best KO victories in the history of the sport. Furthermore, JMM went on to put a violent clinic on Alvarado.