Bradley or Cotto, who is more skilled as a boxer?

I'm going with Bradley
He also did much better against a common opponent in Pacquaio

 

yer great post mate. The idea of getting into a war tends to show lack of skill, as he cannot rely on his boxing skills to get the job done. Nice one atsch

 

Well yer if I had to give an edge to either it would be Bradley. Because Cotto did better than most against Mayweather he gets overrated on this forum. Had the Mayweather fight not taken place and his last performance was the Mayorga fight, people would be going for Tim rather than Miguel.

 

It's kind of close, but Bradley is more skilled. Tim is still improving where as Cotto has maxed out his potential.

There are times when Bradley gets sloppy and his tenacity is what he's known for, but the guy has a lot of skill also.

As someone already mentioned, look no further than both guys in the ring against Pacquiao.

 

I was surprised that the Mayweather fight was so competitive. I thought Mayweather would win by a near shut out. The fact that he stood in front of Cotto, instead of boxing and moving, made the fight more competitive than it should of been.

 

Mayweather did win by a near shut out.

 

Miguel Cotto by a mile. Bradley is tougher but he doesn't have half the skills Cotto has. Cotto has been limited by his work ethics a few times. But his skills are way superior

 

i like timmy but i have to go with cotto, the 154 version

 

Miguel Angel Cotto and I didn't have to think about it.