Bradley " Pacquiao is not the best fighter in the division"

LOL. Obviously you don't say "Bradley's better cause he's black", you try to hide it, but it's clear. JOKE.

Oh there's plenty of question about his power, he's fought many guys he should have KO'd and didn't. He might have some, but it's nowhere as good as you think... please. Getting a free shot at someone when you can load up freely and know you aren't getting hit in return and KOing him is nothing special.

ALL of his KO's are in his first half of the career against total bums. The other 2 KOs are the ones I described and I didn't make anything up in my descriptions of the KOs, that's what happened. What power? He hasn't KOd anyone...

 

You can argue all you want, anyone who looks at the fights can see Holt's power. There really is no discussion.

As for my racism, please tell me how am I a racist. What magic lens do you look through to see what really beats in my heart?:roll::roll:

Getting back on topic, Bradley is correct, Manny isn't the best 140 fighter.

 

Hatton beat fighters he shouldn't have. He was the best at Junior Welterweight for 4 years weather you like it or not. After the Mayweather fight he wasn't the same so bringing up the Lazcano is irrelevant.

 

It's pretty easy to tell from your posts. . Adamek ducking Cunningham too!! to move up to HW!. :rofl

And Holt got some good sneaky power sometimes, that's about it. NOTHING special. Resume is important, and he hasn't done **** with that supposed "great" power.

 

It's a damn stupid opinion and insinuation that Pac is not fighting Bradley next because Roach or somebody else thinks Pac is not going to beat Bradley. The mere fact that established 147 pounders like Mosley and Cotto were the choices of opponents it defeats and removes any further credibility to your arguement. That's too dumb and shallow.

Therefore it's more logical to think for anybody who has a brain to say that it's because of stature and money.

 

Bradley is just needs to get noticed. He'll land a payday fight soon. Just let him do as always, boxing and beating. He just has to find a way to make himself relevant.

 

He was a beast after beating Koysta because he beat Carlos Maussa, Juan Urango, and a shot to hell and buried Castillo? LOL. Listen to yourself. Hatton was garbage at 140 and it shows by who he never fought.

It racist to point out that Adamek is going to fight a worthless fight against a nobody at heavyweight instead of facing his #1 challenger in a rematch of their extremely close first fight? LOL. Yeah, that really shows the racism in my heart.

Holt has power, the is obvious to anyone who has seen him fight.

There was no money in Pac fighting David Diaz, but Roach recommended it because it was winnable and it would get him a title. If Roach saw winnable fights at 135, besides D. Diaz, and 140 he would let Pac stay in those divisions and really clean house, then move up. Like JMM did with 135.

 

Don't even try to deny it.

Anyway wtf am I doing arguing with you if I know that's all you care about? :rofl. Your agenda is clear... keep posting your useless bull****.

 

LOL!!! you agree that bradley is better than pac? good luck to that. LMAO!

 

great post these hypocrites are in denial..hatton ducked every stiff challenge at 140 and cashed in on his meal ticket which was pbf at 147 and pac at 140..hatton was a garbage fighter and doesnt even belong in the hall of fame.

 

Did Bradley beat the best fighter in the JrWW division?

 

Bradley beat 2 out of the top 3 Jr. WW titlist , to make himself the clear cut top Jr. WW. Witter and Holt were both legit Top 3 guys when Bradley fought them. If Bradley beats Nate Campbell, I see no way in which you could say he is not the top 140 fighter, based on resume. Hopefully he fights the winner of the Bailey/ Urango fight and captures 3 main belts.

 

Are you saying now that you don't agree that tim is better than pac? :-(