Bradley-Peterson: Somebody's "0" got to go!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by asero, Sep 11, 2009.


  1. 555east

    555east Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,948
    0
    Oct 24, 2007
    I just went their and I don't see the thread.
     
  2. MALCOLMW

    MALCOLMW New Member Full Member

    86
    0
    Aug 11, 2009
    dr iron fist if you saw the fight tim was kicking nates ass and nate basically quit so why does he deserve a rematch plus peterson is more deserving anyways
     
  3. pipe wrenched

    pipe wrenched ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    29,920
    35
    Mar 31, 2007

    Damn straght!:deal:yep
     
  4. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    If you're going to pick on the basis of rumoured sparring sessions then I doubt it makes much difference whether it was him or his brother...
     
  5. VARG

    VARG Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,005
    0
    Oct 30, 2008
    Seriously **** those guys. **** I think Urango has faced tougher opposition than ****in' Bradley...I seriously don't understand why everyone thinks this guy is the new ruler of the 140 division. He ****in' sucks. He's fast and swings like a girl...so he's a midget Calslappy...he's absolute dog **** and anyone with mental focus (unlike his three biggets wins) will put this guy on his ass and keep him there.

    Im not saying Peterson is some techinically sound boxer puncher that would put Bradley on his ass, which I actually wouldnt be surprised if it happened, Peterson fights smart enough and consistent enough to beat Bradley convincingly.

    Where this favoritism comes from...I seriously have no ****in' idea :conf
     
  6. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    I'm not exactly a Bradley fan but chosing between a guy who has shown composure against veterans and an untested guy who is simply very promising . . . logical choice would be the first.
     
  7. 555east

    555east Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,948
    0
    Oct 24, 2007
    man too bad this fight is quite a while away, really want to see it.

    hopefully the discussion on it will pick up.
     
  8. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,376
    309
    Jan 8, 2009
    im putting my money on peterson
     
  9. kmac619

    kmac619 Active Member Full Member

    917
    0
    Sep 16, 2008
    That is the wbo policy if Bradley fought at home than he gets the 40% split but if they fought at Peterson's home then he would get the 40%.
     
  10. Brickhaus

    Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

    22,296
    6
    Mar 14, 2007
    I might put money on Peterson here if he's a serious underdog. IMO, this is an even matchup. The only reason I might slightly favor Bradley is because he's the champ, and thus may get some benefit of the doubt on the cards, and because he will probably outwork Bradley. I do think Peterson is the more technically sound fighter though.

    I almost feel like Bradley would have been better off facing Alexander as a mandatory. I think Bradley beats Alexander, but Peterson is a much tougher test.
     
  11. Brickhaus

    Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

    22,296
    6
    Mar 14, 2007
    Because (a) Peterson is the interim champ and (b) the WBO is stupid.
     
  12. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,518
    10,396
    Jun 23, 2008
    Should be a good fight. I favor Bradley to win, but if Peterson pulls an upset I wont be very surprised. 140 is an excllent division right now.
     
  13. withoutthee88

    withoutthee88 The Way of the Warrior Full Member

    761
    0
    Sep 11, 2009
    Damn, Russians really don't know **** about boxing, huh?
     
  14. Lacyace

    Lacyace Forever Knight Full Member

    3,170
    3
    Nov 6, 2005
    Peterson is going to win.
     
  15. Pimp C

    Pimp C Free Smurk

    124,307
    36,580
    Jun 23, 2005
    Bradley should win this. His level of comp is a good enough reason for me to pick him in this fight.