Can we do a bit of historical revision and compile a list of fights that have to be retrospectively re-scored under the newly introduced 'Bradley Bill'? To kick us off, I've got... Mavrevic MD12 Lewis Garcia SD15 Sanchez Smith UD12 Tyson Froch SD12 Ward Jones UD12 Calzaghe
I guess Pacquiao dont win rounds unless his opponent hits the canvas. At the end of the day he is a boxer and should be judged the same as every other boxer. when u hit and dont get hit and land the bigger shots it should be a landslide.
Where did i say he don't win rounds unless his opponent hits the canvas? I said he hurt bradley but didn't knock him down, there were no 10-8 rounds and no domination. dude pac looked terrible from round 7 on, sure he did enough but no way was this a land slide. Pac is lucky bradley couldn't break an egg.
Bradley is spot on. He won the fight in the eyes of the judges. No controversy here, just a new champion. People can't stand to see the more known fighter lose. They short-circuit and cry about it.
Says the *******s who was telling people to watch the marquez fight in slomo and watch marquez stepping on pac foot :rofl:rofl Man I love ESB.
i agree with this also. i'm surprised pac didn't go in for the kill a lot more frequently. and the statements "pac took the first two minutes of each round off" aren't hyperbolic, he really didn't engaged much until the final minute - 30 seconds. what was his corner saying to him is what i'd like to know. either way, the decision is the decision, whether it was BS or not. now it's the waiting game to see how everything pans out.
I don't know how you can get mad at a fighter for saying he won a fight in which he got the decision. I personally had Pacquiao winning, but it was closer than Lederman's 119-109 scorecard. I had Pacquiao winning 7 or 8 rounds. I'll have to watch this fight again.