Bradley should accept 40-60 and the fight at the M.E.N

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Earl-hickey, Feb 7, 2011.


  1. Vano-Irons

    Vano-Irons Obsessed with Boxing banned

    17,581
    8
    Jan 18, 2010
    Bradley is the main man at 140. He holds 2 belts outright, and has a case that he should hold 3 (IBF stripping Alexander was a joke IMO). The fight will take place in the US (Bradley's home country) as it makes more financial sense. And u think khan should push for a higher purse? Makes no sense. It's a 50-50 fight at best for Amir.
     
  2. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    Why should Khan get an equal split of the HBO PPV but gets all of the Sky stuff?
     
  3. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    Instead of taking the shitty end of the stick Bradley can just fight Alexander again or move up to 147.

    If Khan thinks he's getting the bigger share he can forget it - this fight has 50-50 written all over it.

    Or at least should do.
     
  4. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    Agree 100%.

    Bradley is a more attractive super fight for Pac or Floyd as well; he'll accept less wonga:deal
     
  5. oli

    oli Boxing Junkie banned

    8,804
    2
    Mar 11, 2010
    If anyone thinks Bradley would or should accept 40-60 is sadly mistaken.

    Khan isnt a draw in USA either. Bradley is no1 in the division
     
  6. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    The fight will get made. Why should we, the fans, give a **** about how much money the fighters get?
     
  7. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    The real question is why does Rob always care about that kinda' stuff?
     
  8. LP_1985

    LP_1985 JMM beat Pac-Man 3 Times Full Member

    30,096
    1
    Sep 6, 2009
    :lol::lol:
     
  9. LP_1985

    LP_1985 JMM beat Pac-Man 3 Times Full Member

    30,096
    1
    Sep 6, 2009
    aint bradley the ring champ aswell:think
     
  10. Earl-hickey

    Earl-hickey Boxing Junkie banned

    14,011
    3
    Oct 31, 2010
    because Khan is the bigger star
     
  11. WalletInspector

    WalletInspector Obsessed with Boxing banned

    21,194
    2
    Jan 1, 2010
    No he's not. Ring decided not to put it up for the Alexander fight.
     
  12. LP_1985

    LP_1985 JMM beat Pac-Man 3 Times Full Member

    30,096
    1
    Sep 6, 2009
    why........:think

    thought it was 1st and 2nd or 1st and third

    WTF is going on:dead
     
  13. Earl-hickey

    Earl-hickey Boxing Junkie banned

    14,011
    3
    Oct 31, 2010
    it can only be 1st and 3rd if there is a good reason 1st and 2nd cant happen, or if 2nd and 3rd are equal.

    Khan is CLEARLY better than alexander.

    so the belt wasnt on the line the ring decided
     
  14. LP_1985

    LP_1985 JMM beat Pac-Man 3 Times Full Member

    30,096
    1
    Sep 6, 2009
    :twisted::twisted::twisted:
     
  15. WalletInspector

    WalletInspector Obsessed with Boxing banned

    21,194
    2
    Jan 1, 2010
    Golden Boy didn't want Bradley bringing another bargaining chip to the table? (Ooooh cynical!) ;)