Bradley stripped of WBC Title - Alexander-Witter for vacant belt

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Henke67, Apr 28, 2009.


  1. Henke67

    Henke67 One of the 45% Full Member

    9,468
    376
    Feb 10, 2009
    The WBC didn't waste any time in stripping Bradley - at least we had the pleasure of seeing two titles unified for, what, a few weeks?
    Apparently Showtime weren't interested in Bradley-Alexander so Bradley's people felt the fight was going to be too difficult to make.
    Nice crossroads fight between Alexander and Witter though.
    Devon has looked good to far but this is a good step up for him.
     
  2. o_money

    o_money Boxing Junkie banned

    11,894
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    **** I hate this ****....go Jr. Witter...why, because we already know he got served by the guy who should have the belt and I can't think of a better way to deligitamise this belt then watching him try to act like a champion again. (can ya tell I'm bitter?)
     
  3. CottoDaBodykill

    CottoDaBodykill Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,735
    15
    Apr 6, 2008
    so the belt organizations basically more or less explained to us that they will not allow unification
     
  4. Boxing Fanatic

    Boxing Fanatic Loyal Member banned

    48,204
    9
    Sep 16, 2008
    Nobody has hardly heard of this guy. I have never seen him fight. Bradley had no choice, but, to vacate the title. Witter isn't much. If Devon is any good, he'll KO Witter, who has lousy defense.
     
  5. Henke67

    Henke67 One of the 45% Full Member

    9,468
    376
    Feb 10, 2009
    I heard Alexander didn't look too good in his latest fight - anyone see it?
    The division takes a step in the right direction with a unification fight, and the WBC takes it two steps backwards.
    The fact Suluiman is in the Hall of Fame is shameful.
     
  6. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    Absolute bull****. The only thing Bradley did wrong, apparently, was not bribe the WBC enough to let him keep their title.
     
  7. Kid Cuba

    Kid Cuba Boxing Junkie banned

    7,712
    0
    Feb 16, 2009
    Well we had a unified champ for all of 24 days, maybe they thought that ws long enough. Go Witter, I guess, at least maybe he can try calling out hatton again (though Hatton hasnt so much as even looked at Witter).
     
  8. H .

    H . Boxing Junkie banned

    12,826
    3
    Jan 20, 2007
    A letter shows that Bradley gave his word to the WBC that as long as they allowed the unification bout, that he would face Alexander next. Now, he's chosen not to face Alexander, so good for the WBC.
     
  9. BlueApollo

    BlueApollo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,827
    3
    May 19, 2007
    Gay. Witter can have that belt, we all know whose it really is.
     
  10. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    The WBC sent Bradley a letter informing him they would strip him(regardless or whether or not he fought Alexander) if he didn't vacate the WBO belt.
     
  11. Little Pea

    Little Pea 'A' grade boxing fan Full Member

    11,750
    1
    Dec 7, 2007
    :shock:
     
  12. elgrancampeon

    elgrancampeon Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,413
    0
    Feb 28, 2008

    True story. Bradley backed out on his word and did not fight his number 1 contender. That is a very legitimate reason for stripping him.
     
  13. emanuel_augustus

    emanuel_augustus Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,905
    14
    Jul 27, 2004
    Why doesn't Bradley just agree to fight Alexander? That's a very winnable fight for him.
     
  14. pudding

    pudding Active Member Full Member

    1,235
    0
    Apr 24, 2005

    no, they expect you to fight your mandatories
     
  15. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    I'm hearing the same thing BigReg did- that they put Bradley on the spot and basically made him choose which one of the titles he wanted to keep.