Bradley vs JMM what i saw

I think Bradley has improved his running slick style. But he is not totally slick he will

probably stand and bang it out! He has some power but not many KO's.

I think it will be a running marathon with Pacquiao getting frustrated.

Do you have a the link to the fight so i can do a professional analysis lol.

 

The problem is Bradley doesn't get enough credit for the clean hard blows he did land, as with any popular fighter the crowd goes nuts even when they clearly miss punches....

Bradley controlled the fight with movement and the jab, he did land clean punches and Marquez barely threw and mostly only waited for the counter, Tim also did good work to the body that goes unnoticed...

Bradley also almost dropped Marquez in the 12th with was the best punch of the entire fight, a left hook...Marquez dud land several hard clean punches but they were few and far in between, he just didn't punch enough, I had it 8-4 Timmy...

 

If Bradley does that, he'll get Hatton'ized!

Lets be real here, the only chance Bradley has is to play it defensive just like he did vs Marquez. His problem is that if he fights the same exact fight vs Pacquiao that he did with Marquez, he's going to lose wide on the cards.
Pretty simple, if the connects are close enough and Pacquiao lands the cleaner harder connects, Bradley is'nt getting a decision this time.

What I'm really saying is that Bradley does'nt have a prayer. He's not explosive enough to score a KO, and he's not good enough to dominate a still exellent fighter in Pacquiao.

 

Bradley beat Marquez because Marquez is old. Marquez turned it up later in the fight and although he got rocked in the last round, he was the better man for a good few rounds, which were the championship rounds. I like Bradley but he only beat JMM because he's old. I was really impressed with JMM, he was frustrated and found another gear at almost 40 years old and imo, could have beaten Bradley had he just gotten going a bit earlier. Yeah, age will do that to you.

 

All I read were a bunch of excuses why jmm lost, he shouldn't have gotten his old ass in there, if that's the case which it isn't, he wasn't too old to flatten Pac...

 

That's not an excuse. It's the truth. Fight was pretty close, and it was JMM who was doing better in the latter rounds, at what? 39 years old?

Him flattening Pac has nothing to do with it. It was just a stunning KO, he was landing great shots in that fight but was getting beat up pretty bad as well. Besides, that's Pac, a guy who goes forward and attacks hard. Bradley moved. Just a different fight but JMM managed to close the gap and made it very close.

 

What makes you think Manny can hit him? He couldn't hit him in the first fight when Bradley had two bad ankles...

Who was the last guy Manny stopped? Cotto(e)? Manny couldn't stop Rios. Rios is a Lightweight.

 

Pacman wins because he is better than JMM although JMM has a good style against Pacman. Sort of like Barkley and Hearns, yet Barkley would never beat Virgil Hill or Ray Leonard.

 

I have a bet going, if Pac KOs Bradley I'm gone for 90 days :yep (won't happen though).

 

I already have a ban bet going bro :rofl

 

Bradley has been in with 2 HOF fighters and 1 very good killing machine. He's experienced Pac's speed and power, Provodnikov's raw aggression, and Marquez's boxing genius...back-to-back. And, he got the nod in all 3 contests. Yes, I feel he lost the Pac fight, but, it was not a blowout. He's survived all the ridicule and backlash from that fight and is HUNGRY to set the record straight. He is definitely a better fighter from these experiences. Now, whether he is now better than Pac, h2h, we will see on Saturday.