Bradley vs Khan.....

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by gooners!!, Jan 31, 2011.


  1. gooners!!

    gooners!! Boxing Junkie banned

    10,166
    1
    Jan 15, 2009

    You would think that, I did, but it seems that a lot of black fighters seem to have a good to generous reach, even smaller guys. Apparently Qawi was 5"5, but have over a 70 inch reach.


    I think in spots Khan will be be effective doing that, but im thinking what happens when he flurries, moves away, and Bradley, whilst cutting the ring down, is keeping the pressure on him? cause when pressure has been put on him(Kotelnik, Maidana) in the past, it seems to as though he looks uncomfortable when having to fight at a harder pace, that he gets himself trapped on the ropes. I take the point Bradley does not hit like Maidana, but I think you could argue he's more consistent, has a better defense when on offense, and will certainly cut the ring down better than Maidana did.

    I might WANT! Bradley to win, I dont know, I am more of a fan of him, so maybe im willing him on? I do think he has a great chance though.
     
  2. calumowns

    calumowns Member Full Member

    145
    0
    Jan 6, 2011
    Bradley apparently has a reach of 69 inches, while Khan has a reach of 72
     
  3. gooners!!

    gooners!! Boxing Junkie banned

    10,166
    1
    Jan 15, 2009
    So 3 inches? not as significant as I think we all anticipated
     
  4. Coldhearted

    Coldhearted Active Member Full Member

    1,009
    0
    May 17, 2010
    I would feel it would be slightly unfair to base Khan's ring generalship on the Maidana fight as Khan was trying to prove a point a bit like what Pac was doing against Margarito he didn't have to stay on the ropes.

    If you want to see good movement look at the Kotelnik and Malignaggi fight, this is the type of Khan that can easily outbox Bradley. With all respect to Bradley he is a good fighter and a good champion but i just dont think he can win rounds against Khan. Maidana is under-rated in my opinion he is very strong and very aggressive I dont know how many LWW's can cope with Maidana.

    Bradley may pose a few issues on the inside but I honestly think Khan will beat him to the punch everytime.
     
  5. DDDUUDDDEE

    DDDUUDDDEE Undisputed Ambien (taker) Full Member

    17,608
    23
    Oct 25, 2010
    This is how I see it as well.

    Great analysis.
     
  6. Govanmauler

    Govanmauler Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,919
    10
    May 30, 2007

    I couldnt call you wrong for that either man , Khan either has to stay away completely ( real hard for 36 minutes ! ) or improve dramatically on the inside. its a proper 50-50 fight , unlike the alexander one ;)
     
  7. timmyjames

    timmyjames PTurd curb stomper Full Member

    12,816
    1
    Nov 14, 2009
    i like them both, but think tim could pull it off....if maidana, a slugger, can catch khan, bradley sure can...and i don't know if khan can keep bradley off of him

    could be a great fight with different styles though
     
  8. Gneus7

    Gneus7 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,277
    495
    Mar 29, 2007
    I don't think Bradley will be able to get past Khan's jab & combos's. Khan UD or TKO .
     
  9. gooners!!

    gooners!! Boxing Junkie banned

    10,166
    1
    Jan 15, 2009


    Good point, I do think he looked worse cause he was trying hard to impress.




    I thought he looked okay with Kotelnik whilst Kotelnik wasn't pressing him too hard, but his lack of ring generalship showed up in the last few rounds of that fight imo, as Kotelnik, realizing he was behind, started to apply more pressure, difference is, I think Bradley applies more pressure than him, will cut the ring down better, is not a defensive mid range type fighter like Kotelnik. When Bradley gets to the spot he will throw, when Kotelnik got the the spot, he would stalk, seemed content to shell up and wait for a spot to time a counter when you start punching at him. Kotelnik did'nt cut his thinking time down enough imo.

    I dont know who to pick categorically, although I lean toward Bradley, I just question how Khan's limitations, his lack of an inside game, questionable footwork when under pressure, wont play a big factor in the fight.
     
  10. gooners!!

    gooners!! Boxing Junkie banned

    10,166
    1
    Jan 15, 2009
    You know just thinking about it, maybe Bradley doesn't have to exclusively be the one getting off first? maybe he can also cut the ring down, stalk him, maneuver Khan into vulnerable positions(the ropes), where he can bang him? cause Khan does not have the best ring generalship imo.
     
  11. Coldhearted

    Coldhearted Active Member Full Member

    1,009
    0
    May 17, 2010
    The good news is that all of Khan's weaknesses that have been stated can be improved and taught especially with someone like Roach whereas Khan's strengths cannot be taught/improved e.g. good jab, natural handspeed, natural aggression. The other major factor is that Khan hasn't peaked yet so from a logical perspective there will be a better Khan come fight night against Bradley
     
  12. Govanmauler

    Govanmauler Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,919
    10
    May 30, 2007

    thats ( a better way ) of saying what I was trying to say.

    Physically / stylistic each has something the other doesnt so its who is able to get into the places the need to be that wins it.

    Tell you what though , this fight seemed like a great idea yesterday , but now Im so excited at the possibility I'll be gutted if doesnt go ahead !
     
  13. gooners!!

    gooners!! Boxing Junkie banned

    10,166
    1
    Jan 15, 2009
    Yeah that is conceivable.

    I do think Khan's jab is massively overrated though to be honest. Amir's jab looked good against Malignaggi cause (a) Malignaggi has no glove defense, he only slips punches, which is probably why he gets hit so much, as occasionally you need to parry, catch punches, as you cant just reply on slipping them (b) because he had the center of the ring.

    I dont think Amir would get center ring against Bradley, and that if he does, and he does try to dominate with the jab, it wont work, cause Bradley can fight on the backfoot, as well as he can on the front foot, and because he has good footspeed, he would be able to offset that jab imo. Bradley also know how to catch, parry, not just slip.

    I think Bradley would have an easier time counter punching Khan on the backfoot, than he would trying to counter him on the front foot, cause Khan fights in straight lines, and he has no head-movement to create angles in order to step off the line.
     
  14. Coldhearted

    Coldhearted Active Member Full Member

    1,009
    0
    May 17, 2010
    Definitely agree that Bradley at this point of time seems like the more intelligent boxer and has achieved more so far. This fight raises so many issues whether both boxers will be able to effectively use their strengths its almost like they cancel each other out, I guess it just boils down to who will be better prepared on the night!!
     
  15. gooners!!

    gooners!! Boxing Junkie banned

    10,166
    1
    Jan 15, 2009
    Yeah, tis a weird situation, as both have the ability to cause the other major problems, only Khan might have a slight head start, due to his style, and that is where I think Bradley's window of opportunity is, can he bridge the gap(head start), that Amir already has, and exploit his flaws enough! to surpass what he (Khan) can do to negate Bradley?

    Early rounds might be key, cause if Khan gets too many rounds in the bank, Bradley might dig himself into a hole, but again, that's whats great about this fight, due to Khan's flaws, Bradley has a chance to dig himself out of that hole.