Bradley: Why is he not popular even after annihilating PAC?!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Timothy, Aug 22, 2012.


  1. randy brown

    randy brown $$$ Full Member

    1,866
    0
    Oct 28, 2011
    because timmeh is a humble dude.
     
  2. Boxing Fanatic

    Boxing Fanatic Loyal Member banned

    48,204
    9
    Sep 16, 2008
    the ts must be michigan warrior

    looks like hes been floored again
     
  3. kalunya5964

    kalunya5964 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,263
    0
    Sep 14, 2008
    Because most fight fans were blind, they could not see how he dominated Pacquiao for twelve rounds!:-(
     
  4. kalunya5964

    kalunya5964 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,263
    0
    Sep 14, 2008
    No, you're not biased. I scored it 119-109 for Bradley!
     
  5. jyuza

    jyuza Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,394
    8
    Sep 12, 2005
    So I guess you had Bradley winning the fight ?
     
  6. Knickerbocker

    Knickerbocker Active Member Full Member

    1,252
    0
    Jan 16, 2011
    isnt it sad that a prime, strong, young, fast African American couldnt put away an old ass, slow, bad legs Pacquiao? Much less even land one meaningful punch.

    shows how great Pac really was in his PRIME....and why Floydette avoided him and made him sweat like a ho in church!

    :rofl
     
  7. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    I wouldn't use the word "annihilating" to describe the efforts of either Bradley or Pacquiao.
     
  8. Asterion

    Asterion Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,459
    20
    Feb 5, 2005
    Personality.

    Many doubt that he actually beat Pac. I think he did.
     
  9. RealBoxing

    RealBoxing Kill The Nonsense Full Member

    2,783
    0
    Feb 15, 2009
    Bradley clearly beat Pac, Fight was easy to score for Bradley. :deal
     
  10. RingKing

    RingKing Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,018
    623
    Feb 21, 2008
    I seriously hope you people are kidding!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :patsch
     
  11. pmfan

    pmfan Active Member Full Member

    1,408
    2
    May 11, 2008
    They have to be. This boxing forum should have a moderator that removes posts from the majority of posters. But I guess who the heck would want that thankless job.
     
  12. Bazooka

    Bazooka Pimp C Wants 2 Be Me Full Member

    44,390
    5
    Oct 23, 2005
    Yes I did! I had it 7-5 Tim Bradley, rewatched it and gave the 4th to bradley as well giving him 8-4 2nd time around.

    I scored the first 3 and the last 3 and the 7th for Tim first time around. I did not see Manny dominate, Or Rock or stagger and batter Bradley I saw Manny missing allot, fighting only 30 seconds per round and looking sloppy while Timmy with two injured feet was able to still get in enough work to win rounds allot of it has to do with Manny simply not fighting for a full 3 mins he waited until the later seconds of the rounds and I am sorry but if your not fighting your not scoring and if your not scoring how can you expect to win?
     
  13. jyuza

    jyuza Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,394
    8
    Sep 12, 2005
    I agree with that. Which is why I saw Pacquiao winning by 2 rounds easy.
    Scoring that one for Tim as widely as you saw it is beyond me. Even surprise me a little from you actually. But maybe it's just me.
     
  14. Gander Tasco

    Gander Tasco Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,438
    24
    Mar 13, 2010
    You gave the first 3 rounds to Bradley? Your clearly a numbskull.
     
  15. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    Bradley didn't annihilate Pacquiao. He won a close decision, in a fight that could have gone to either man. Saying that Bradley annihilated Pacquiao is just as stupid as saying Pacquiao was robbed.