Bradley: Why is he not popular even after annihilating PAC?!

Why hasn't this guy made a clip of Bradley landing some punches? The reason is they don't exist. His clip is all about his hatred of Lampley and nothing to do with what happened in the fight. YOU DO NOT SCORE LANDING ON PEOPLES ARMS AND GLOVES! Are People really this dumb.?

 

if you watched the entire Video you would have seen that he covered that as well and not only did he cover it he exposed how HBO blatantly said nothing each and every time Bradley was scoring.
Ohh and BY the way in case you didnt know the person who made that video is a Pacquiao fan, and hates the **** out of Floyd

 

how do you annihilate someone yet end up in a wheel chair with 2 legs bandaged all the way up to your balls?

 

I've already seen the fight with the sound off, I honestly have tried very hard to see how Bradley could have won as maybe I and the other 95% missed something. Also sometimes you just expect something and when things don't go that way you have an automatic bias in scoring the fight. I felt that the outrage for JMM-Pac was unfair as a closer look at the fight without the great expectations for a Pac runover shows a very close fight with many swing rounds, people will give me **** for watching that fight in slow-mo but it takes a lot of patience to do that and IMO really shows that you really wanna know the truth for yourself without external circumstances influencing your bias. I still scored it for JMM by a round, you would have to be quite generous to score a draw for Pac and very generous to score a win for Pac which the judges were that night. However, given that there were so many swing rounds, it was still IMO justifiable, hence why despite the majority thought JMM won, most had it a draw and some had Pac winning.

I tried to approach the Pac-bradley fight from this pov and gave Bradley the benefit of doubt, I still cant score it for him. If I was to give him every close round, it would still be 7-5 to Pac, so a draw would have still been a **** decision but a win? Baffles me.

Compubox is not the deciding factor for scoring a fight, I already said that, however, it is indicative of how a fight went. Look at all compubox fights and you will see a correlation between compubox numbers and the winner, specially when its that big disparity between 2 numbers. Also I find compubox to be inaccurate as when I counted punches landed in Pac-JMM 3, it was a lot less than compubox stated, however it was pretty much in ratio of true punches landed ie compubox says JMM landed 14, pac 13 it may have been more like Pac 8, JMM 11. Sure not 100% accurate but provides a good resource.

Now I already said thats not the deciding factor, when you take into account that Pac nearly landed double in compubox, 95% of viewers at home thought Pac won, 95% of people at the arena who wasnt listening to HBO's bias thought Pac won, 95% of media insiders thought Pac won, the 5 WBO judges unanimous in Pac win, Bradley himself needing to review the tape to see if he won, you add all those factors together and you know who won.

I know you're not a ***** and I'm sure you are being unbiased in your scoring, however you are in a huge minority in your opinion and 'usually' that means you are wrong. Having said that, I'm not flaming you, you're entitled to your opinion, you're obviously seeing something else from us and some rounds were close enough that given how subjective boxing scoring is, maybe it may just fall to Bradley.

Pac's fault for fighting 1 min of every round IMO, judges score heavily against inactivity. That was the worst performance of Pac i've ever seen, he looked like a physical beast in JMM 3 despite losing but absolute shite in that Bradley fight. IMO if Pac of the JMM 3 fight turns up, he stops Bradley easy but he may have just peaked physically in that fight and its all downhill from here. Stamina is the first to go in aging fighters, not a good sign.

 

The bell rang ending several rounds where Bradley had him badly hurt and ready to go.


Yep.


:nut

 

if you want to have any credibility on this site, please refrain from writing incredibly stupid posts.

bradley was pretty much dominated. he didn't win you numb skull.

 

tim did nothing but get beat in convincing fashion.

 

:rofl:rofl

is this thread where all the ****ing morons come? it sure looks like it to me.

bradley won? :rofl:roflatsch just too stupid for words.

 

Alts, alts, alts, alts and alts..............unly one IP-adress should be aloud..........

 

close the thread

 

Umm No bradley was not dominated as I said that Video in this thread exposes the Biased set forth by HBO and *******s

 

someone with a bit of sense. by far the best post i've seen in some time.

this site is like a disease.

 

he was dominated. pac landed the heavier and clearer shots all night. bradley won one clear round.

 

umm no, he pretty much was. stop watching boxing if you think bradley won that fight. you do it a major disservice.

this is the reason boxing is going to die out completely. bacause of morons like yourself.

 

Shut the **** up Manny did not dominate he didnt land the cleaner harder shots all night get the **** out of here with your lies.
If Manny himself felt that way we would have had an immediate rematch

Boxing is dying out because of the blatant biased by networks writers and fans, what happend there was pac fought a lazy fight how do you expect to win a fight fighting only 30 seconds per round? get ****ing real