breaking down this heavyweight era and others: Why today stinks!!

Do you stand by this claim:

Using the numbers he's fought less top 10 contenders than the champs of most other era's and this supports my contention

Wlad top 10 opponents (Year Before) from 2006-2014

Brock #7 2005
Brewster #7 2006
Ibgraminov #6 2007
Thompson #9 2007
Chageav #3 2008
Chambers #3 2009
Haye #2 2010
Povetkin #2 2012

total=8

Do you feel these men made more title defenses against top 10 opponents in the timeframes you agreed to be eras? That is what your statment claimed.

Lewis 2000-2003
Holyfield 90-99
Tyson 86-90
Holmes 79-85
Patterson 56-62
Marciano 52-55
Dempsey 24-26

 

:nut Congratulations on ignoring the guideline that I laid out and you seriously want to wager with money? You couldn't even follow the timeframes we agreed on for some reason, you are hopeless.

Lewis title defenses against top 10 opponents from 00-03
#3 Grant (99)
#5 Tua (99)
#9 Rahman (00) L
#2 Tyson (01)
#7 Vitali (02)
total=5


Marciano title defenses against top 10 opponents from 52-55:
#1 Walcott (52)
#7 LaStarza (52)
#2 Charles (53)
#2 Charles (53)
#2 ****ell (54)
(LHW Champ) Moore (54)
total=6


Patterson title defenses against top 10 opponents from 56-62:
#1 Jackson (56)
#4 Harris (57)
#8 London (58)
#1 Ingo (58) L
#2 Ingo (60)
#1 Liston (61) L
total: 6

More to come....

Using the numbers he's fought less top 10 contenders than the champs of most other era's and this supports my contention.

But this has already been shown to be false.

 

Than how about you end the conversation there, you dense **** :-(

 

Tyson title defenses against top 10 opponents from 86-90

#2 Smith (86)
#3 Thomas (86)
#9 Biggs (86)
#8 Tucker (86)
Lineal Champ Spinks (87)
#2 Williams (89 )
#7 Douglas (89 ) L
total: 7

Holyfield title defenses against top 10 opponents from 90-99
#10 Foreman (90)
#3 Bowe (91) L
#4 Moorer (93) L
#3 Tyson (96)
#4 Moorer (96)
#2 Lewis (99 )D
#2 Lewis (99 )L
total: 7

I would continue with Holmes but what is the point? Your statement is wrong. As Champion, Wlad has fought more top 10 opponents then Lewis, Holyfield, Marciano, Patterson, and Tyson in the timeframes we agreed upon when they were the top man of their era.

 

-No, you did agree with those dates.

-Jackson I, Ingo II, Liston II were not title defenses.

-Louis and Layne occurred in 1951, nor where they title defenses. In this method the 51 rankings would cover the 52 fights.

_THIS WAS THE QUESTION:

you feel these men made more title defenses against top 10 opponents in the timeframes you agreed to be eras?

You did not follow this and now behaving like a child when called out upon it.

 

Berbick was not a title defense. It was the transition to Tyson's reign.

I did not include Byrd with Wlad either because it was not a title defense.

You are the one who used the language "Champs", and so I specified title defenses with this challenge. You didn't follow that.

-Ok...

 

Your question answered?

Wlad=8 in 7 years=1.14
Lewis=5 in 3 years=1.66
Holyfield=7 in 10 years=.7
Tyson=7 in 4 years=1.75
Patterson=6 in 6 years=1.0
Marciano=6 in 3 years=2.0

I like these results. No discrepancy in era, longer the reign, the less frequent is the real interesting trend here.

 

Kill yourself. Your rant is beyond generic, you ****ing parroting it contributes nothing to this forum and is a waste of time to boot.

 

Frankly JAB you should kill yourself.

I'm frankly ticked off that you "agreed" to the eras, than turned around and backtracked and said you didn't agree with two of them all in the same page.

This shows a lack of character, and makes one question why they should waste their time with you. I am at that point. Time to let this one die.