breaking down this heavyweight era and others: Why today stinks!!

Before or after the numbers do not lie. You can't change the fact this eras numbers come in last whether you use my method or Mongoose's method. But troll on my man, troll on!! :rofl

 

Why would you address Goose? He's done with this thread.....or at least that's what he's saida number of times now.

 

On the contrary, at least he is able to debate his own points and has actual knowledge of the sport whether I agree with him or not. But if you keep saying you're done, be done, don't keep on about it. You on the other hand can only piggy back someone else point and harp on the same things over and over that have already been explained and answered. I do however appreciate that you keep bumping the thread! :good

 

Already been answered.

 

The fact is that using either before or after ranking the numbers come out virtually the same and this era falls short. Please, keep participating though, but I'm not going to keep rehashing things I've been over because you don't like the answers. Sorry son, I don't play that game.

 

Already been answered.

 

The thread YOU have been asking for? I challenged you to come up with a top 10 from every era and I'd do the same, than we could break down the number using either before or after rankings. You passed wanting me to start a new thread. I'm not starting a new thread when this is a perfectly good one discussing the topic at hand. If you want to do this than let's do it, but it will be in this thread.

The more posts the more views. The more views the more people realize how bad this era is. Why do you think I love when you keep bumping it?

 

Go find it.

 

I'm waiting....I challenged you. I want your top ten contenders from this era, Lewis' era, Holyfield, Tyson, Holmes, Ali, Patterson, Marciano, Charles, And Louis. Get crackin boy, you got a lot of work!

And keep on bumping!! :rofl

 

Sorry kid but that's not the way it works. My thread my rules. You could of course start your own thread. :yep