Breaking news: Pacquiao didn't agree to the 50/50 split..

yep. hatton is not a PPV draw in the US. his last fight w/ malignaggi wasn't even PPV in the US while pac has PPV fights even w/ opponents like diaz and solis.

 

50/50 is fair. I don't see why Hatton should budge, he's the bigger draw.

 

for the sole reason that he was going up against the best fighter in the world. what other ppv's did he sell without pbf? so ove good selling ppv against pbf makes him a proven ppv seller? that's what proven is?

 

answer this. would hatton vs his next best opponent outsell pac vs jmm3 which is by far the next biggest option for pac?

 

in UK, definitely. but in the US where the fight will be, no.

 

They don't call him Money Pacquiao for nothing.

 

Pacman probably needs to top up the coffers to keep funding all the eating and dieting contests he holds amongst his bemused (and very large waisted) entourage.

 

bbbbull****..

 

The general British sporting public are easily brain-washed into thinking what they are watching is the best available. Ricky Hatton could fight a blown-up Super-bantamweight and if the TV comentators say that it should be a close and exciting fight a million people would buy it.

Most people I know know that I'm a boxing fan and they hardly ever express an interest in it. When Hatton fought Mayweather a lot of them bought the PPV and didn't even know who Mayweather was!

 

so why isnt every hatton fight a ppv if he sells as well as you claim he does?

and i dont buy the they didnt know who pbf bull****. it sold well because he was against pbf. what other hatton ppvs sold a million in uk?

 

It is clear now Pac does not want this fight. 50/50 is perfectly fair.

What a farce and joke this has become.

 

no it wouldn't, are you forgetting the pbf fight? it would be manny's biggest purse at 50% though

 

It's all about the f*ck*ng fricki'n money...atsch

 

hatton was never offered delahoya, he would have snatched his hand off. this is just a lie.