BREAKING NEWS Povetkin's B sample positive

What does naturally occurring substance have to do with anything, do you mean naturally occurring in the human body? Because there's a lot of things which do occur naturally in the body that you can't take (ie testosterone, EPO) and I'm sure there are things which don't occur naturally that are legal to take in boxing.

 

You said Urine test:rofl

 

I hear you and I really don't have a dog in this fight but the fact that Povetkin tested negative a couple of times before he came up positive and that the testing was conducted by the same testing agency is damning in my opinion. I think that the last time he didn't completely flush the meldonium out of his system but that's just my opinion.

 

:worm

 

His "clean" tests came within the last few months while he was training to fight Wilder.

 

This was a urine test, not a blood test.

 

:worm

 

:mj

 

ld

 

When was the last time you smoked marijuana?

 

Always hurling those insults like the b!tch made ladyboy you are I see. Here's what we know about the Mayweather incident...he was not found of any wrongdoing...by the AUTHORITIES on the matter. And you along with Thomas Hauser and similar clowns are just pulling out your hair trying to find anything in the fine print that supports your point...which no one cares about, by the way. You are on a pointless agenda based crusade, which leads to nothing but wasted time on a message board...or "carefully reading" articles from hack journalists, which just got swept aside. So...who is too f*cking stupid now?

Using an IV is equivalent to doping? Man...you're are as dumb as a box of rocks. I bet PEDvetkin wishes it was just an IV, which was getting him all this attention.

And of course you replied about nothing related to PEDvetkin, because, you know you have no real argument. You can't hide your hypocrisy. It's on full display. You want to discuss legalities and technicalities when it suits your argument. But, you want to throw that out of the window when it comes to certain others. We see who you are b!tch...pull your skirt down.

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk

 

By the WADA Code, IV use is strictly banned. It's obvious you never wondered why a banned practice by Fluid was not only allowed but protected?


And what's this **** about Povetkin? Is this out of some flos manual or something? When you got jack, call the opposition Povetkin fans? Roflmao.

 

The A & B sample are taken from the same urine so there's no real surprises they have both come up postive. The point of the B sample is to rule out any interference that may have occurred in the lab.
What is important is if there is a minimum acceptable limit and if he tested under this limit, as reported. The fact this information hasn't been released is making the testing appear very unprofessional and is why the WBC is conducting there own investigation. Until proven the WBC can't suspend or remove Povetken from their ratings.

 

True, the WBC have to do their due diligence however I don't think there is a limit. Minute traces of Clen were enough to strip Contador of his wins for 2010 to 2011 even though he fought hard to claim tainted beef. The limit that ppl were talking about before is for those who tested positive before March 2016, so if they were positive before then, it was not considered doping if it was below that limit. However, after that date I don't think there is a limit.

http://www.sportsintegrityinitiativ...certainty-after-wada-meldonium-clarification/

 

Roids and PEDs.