Breazeale vs Izu

I have watched tape thats why Izu is faster ,he throws full force more too and in more distinct combinations. Parkers chin is way up in the air and EASILY hittable. Izu is in a croutched position and moves at different angles...Parker not so much. I could see Izus impact when he hits it is different.

Who would win? Probably Parker bc hes at a better stage now. but talent wise Izu has more to work with, he needs to be better defensivley bc hes not as durable as Parker,but parker has not taken actual power shots from real HW punchers yet.

 

Takam would not beat Breazeale and neither would undersized Ruiz.

I would give slight edge to Parker over Izu for proven durabilty but thats the only reason.

i also am sure Breazeale will catch up to Izu on the voting poll...he seems to be all of a sudden gaining momentum on here! i could swear there was like 4 voted for Breazeale before the fight started?

 

Well you have to go against the grind most of the time and actually see whats going on. If i have a ranked guy somewhere trust me ...hes there for a reason and its not bc i looked up his resume bc then i wouldnt need to look at actual skills /attributes which is whats first important when matching guys.. lol

 

Izu is an elite fighter ,however the differance using Wlad was he literally battered Purity and it wasnt even close in skill. Breazeale is no cake walk and ppl are overlooking this. izu hits HARD. Im pretty good at judging power and he can punch. this also tells me besides Breazeale making many difficult fights for everyone but Izu is better than guys that have already got title shots.He knocks out Browne/Ruiz and Stivern.

 

After this week ...here is a revamped look at ACTUAL rankings based on SKILL and head to head match ups...NOT who didnt fight this or that guy resume garbage. This would be the TOP guys if they were in REAL life had to selected.I took some down and put some over recent listings. Yes i know its MADNESS!

1/ Joshua
2/ Klitchko
3/ Haye
4/ Ortiz
5/ Wilder
6/ Parker
7/ Whyte
8/ Breazeale
9/ Izu
10/ Pulev

Secondary bracket under top 10 fighters......


1/ Miller
2/ Ruiz
3/ Granat
4/ Washington
5/ Briggs
6/ Jennings
7/ chisora
8/ Stivern
9/ Helenius
10/ Wach

 

True i did the list on the fly....i added him.

Briggs knocks out anyone i have him ranked over. Jennings would not stand up to Briggs,he gets knocked out inside 5 rnds based on their recent fights. Skills and attributes just dont just entirely disappear Briggs is a live wire. Until that someone runs around and he gasses and loses ..well he stays. lol

please note some guys arent exactly fleet footed and made to order for the revived Briggs to knock out who are actually ranked over him in OFFICIAL rankings...you will see i am right if he fights them. He will hammer many guys out if he comes in cardio shape.

 

Well when you use the ( hasnt fought anyone ) well why do they need to fight anyone and who are these someones? Its not difficult at all to take two fighters and access who has the advantage or what skill level they are on. Why would it be? You simply look at video footage in their fights and see strengths vs weaknesses. If we had a fair ranking system you would have competitve fights instead you get Stivern vs Wilder rehash all over again .Briggs vs Oquendo and so on........

If you kept all my top ten guys and let them fight it out with NUMEROUS match ups i guarantee you would see more Breazeale vs Izu like matches.Based on the majority here wouldnt have Izu ranked on his loss which would be dumb.Why take out a guy more skilled and improving...makes no sense..which why i have him ranked around where he should be.

 

Breazeale is ranked over Izu ( HE WON )

As stated my rankings are logical and ive proving that time and time again in actual match ups almost always. the only thing is after my top ten where fighters are still question marks to me...i have MY top ten down to a tee which is why they are ranked over the guys not top 10. Rankings after that is more tricky.