It would, making the title fight even bigger. Hector Lombard is a former champ, and hasn't lost in 6 years. A few guys can be ready over the next few months, but Bisping v Lombard makes the most sense.
It w0ould be a very good fight, but it's a stretch to call it huge. Be a brilliant co-main event, but Lombard is a non-entity to most casual MMA fans, to be brutally honest. Bisping draws best when he's on home turf or fighting an American face. Michael v Stann would be bigger for that reason alone, although I think the Lombard match is the more exciting
I'm looking forward to most of u on here witnessing that Lombard ain't that good.. Stann would of beat him ..Lombard is a bully who has been successful of late fighting mostly here on Australia against tuf rejects..
Hes a roid head, and will get beaten up without the drugs In my eyes he lost to some unknown Russian Shlemenko The better middleweights will take the bully to school Anderson would knock him senseless Harris would be a brilliant brutal fight
:rofl:rofl:rofl The dude, even sick, beat Shlemenko from post to post. Watch the fight and don't talk ****... lost to Shlemenko... What a ******.
The irony coming from a Paul Harris fan here is brilliant :rofl Shlemenko isnt top draw, but he's a good fighter by the way. But he got his ass beat for 4 rounds and put on a good showing in the 5th :roll: