Bridgerweight

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by HolDat, Oct 9, 2022.


  1. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    61,553
    82,026
    Aug 21, 2012
    Stupid weightclass.
     
  2. heerko koois

    heerko koois Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,289
    18,042
    Apr 26, 2006
    10 weightclasses would be fine....no more please !!
     
    Jpreisser likes this.
  3. Pepsi Dioxide

    Pepsi Dioxide Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,289
    12,320
    Oct 22, 2020
    I'll make a deal, keep bridgerweight but bring back one title per division. I've said it before, I don't see why the alphabet boys in their quest for greed don't just make a division for every pound from 105 to 275 lbs. Really milk this thing
     
    serioussam, Fogger and HolDat like this.
  4. MorvidusStyle

    MorvidusStyle Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,791
    6,170
    Jul 11, 2017
    What they actually need to do is fill the gap between 175 and 200. That's the glaring fault.

    The big differences at HW I don't really care about since a lot of those heavies are chancers who could lose fat and fight at cruiser. If they did that the differences would mostly go away. If these small HWs want to risk it up there then that's their choice.

    The big differences make it interesting anyway, since you don't get such freakish size differences in other divisions. So HW becomes a bit of a wildcard division and everything else is in decent order.

    Basically they should just get rid or two or three (or more) of the lowest divisions and put in a 185-188lb division.
     
    DramaShow and HolDat like this.
  5. HolDat

    HolDat Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,599
    2,751
    Sep 25, 2020
    To piggyback your point, 185-190 would be explosive!

    Going down to just 1 or 2 belts would help immensely.
     
  6. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member

    76,066
    40,612
    Jan 22, 2015
    I mean who is even the Bridgerweight Champeen of the world? Seems like the idea of a BW division tanked before it even started.
     
    HolDat likes this.
  7. lone star

    lone star Active Member Full Member

    884
    1,070
    Mar 10, 2018
    At the least a decent name for the division would help. Any ideas?
     
    HolDat likes this.
  8. Braindamage

    Braindamage Baby Face Beast Full Member

    11,113
    10,198
    Oct 1, 2011
    Fury has slickness and boar meat. Lethal combination. Makes a big man invincible.
     
  9. HolDat

    HolDat Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,599
    2,751
    Sep 25, 2020
    Oscar Rivas lol
     
  10. HolDat

    HolDat Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,599
    2,751
    Sep 25, 2020
    Either Usyk or the next dominant cruiser.
     
  11. Levook

    Levook Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,650
    3,146
    Aug 26, 2020
    They're going to have to have longer ropes & bigger rings soon.
     
  12. lobk

    lobk Original ESB Member Full Member

    29,682
    19,200
    Jul 19, 2004
    WBC trying hard to get more sanctioning money.
     
    HolDat likes this.
  13. DoubleJab666

    DoubleJab666 Dot, dot, dot... Full Member

    11,843
    15,619
    Nov 9, 2015
    Unless the division can attract some serious money - and why would it at present? - Top CWs will skip it for the HW division where they can earn way better purses for getting hit very hard by very big men (as opposed to being hit very hard by slightly smaller men for less cash) and only failed HWs will drop down to compete there. It's destined to be a division of mediocrity...
     
    reckless and HolDat like this.
  14. HolDat

    HolDat Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,599
    2,751
    Sep 25, 2020
    You're not wrong. If the division sticks around like other divisions, it can boost a fighter's legacy whose chasing HW greatness.
     
  15. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,999
    11,953
    Jan 6, 2007
    This.

    And it shouldn't be accorded legitimacy serious fighters.