Bringing up Singsurat and Torrecampo is SO irrelevant!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by mrtony80, Nov 23, 2009.


Page 2 of 2
  1. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    People just don't have brains to think for themselves. An idiot like Nallege says it constantly and it will spread and infect a few people to think this is substantial or all of a sudden important. These haters or people probably weren't even aware of these fights.

    And no, I was criticizing the paragraphs... obviously (That's a good thing. Nobody wants a jumbled mess to read). But I was mainly saying why wrote 3 paragraphs for something so obvious. But I get you, I'd just ignore it. It came from the disease and it has infected a few others. Dumb people can get duped easily though.
     
    PetethePrince, Nov 23, 2009
    PetethePrince, Nov 23, 2009
    #16
  2. Zak2

    Zak2 Active Member Full Member

    1,078
    0
    Oct 30, 2009
    Its not irrelevant because some of you act is if Pac is invincible. Singsurat and Torrecampo proved he's not.
     
    Zak2, Nov 23, 2009
    Zak2, Nov 23, 2009
    #17
  3. mrtony80

    mrtony80 Likes thick chicks Full Member

    8,114
    391
    Sep 2, 2009
    Well, he wasn't considered invincible back then...that's the point I'm trying to make. Before the Cotto fight, I didn't think Pacquiao was invincible, but after the fight...well, just let me say that NOBODY is invincible, but as of right now, Pacquiao is pretty damn close. But I challenge you to name one thing either of those guys did that Cotto did not. Why did Pac lose to them and not Cotto?
     
    mrtony80, Nov 23, 2009
    mrtony80, Nov 23, 2009
    #18
Page 2 of 2