british blood fighters vs irish blood fighters

only counting the fully british blood fighters, so degale, froch, brook and haye dont count because they only have one british parent. which are better?

irish:
matt macklin, frankie gavin, carl frampton, tyson fury, brian magee, paul mcloskey, dean byrne, jamie kavangah, andy lee.

british:
kevin mitchell, george groves, darren barker, david price, nathan cleverly, ricky burns, tony bellew, john murray,. jamie mcdonnell.


for me the irish have more quality fighters.

 

as far as im concerned if both your parents are irish like, gavin, macklin and fury your a full blooded irish person. different race of poeple to the english scottish and welsh...... im asking which race makes the better fighters.

 

wales is in britain. its basically irish and nothern irish vs welsh, scottish and english.

 

i doint want a massive argument 10 pages long but ive noticed how most of the best young white boxers in britain are actually irish. not too many english at all.

 

yeah the irish seem to be tough guys, if you compare irish vs just english they dont even compare..... yeah gavin looks good but to be honest i think rampton is the best irish prospect! he reminds me of a young morales at times, pluss jamie kavangah looks like a real prospect too.

 

i suppose irish are more celtic and less Scandinavian and roman. obviously they were isolated from the roman empire so havnt had as many different mixesin race over the years.

i know its a daft thread but there a lot of good irish fighters compared to english scottish and welsh.

 

ok what i mean is irish opeople are genetically dierent to people in ireland, scotland wales and england. they're more shut off from immigration over the years so they're more celtic than people in england. seem to produce more fighters.