British Documentary in 2000 on Roy Jones, no mention of Calzaghe

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by kmac, Apr 21, 2014.


  1. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    first line doesn't even make any sense, so don't know what you're trying to say there.

    Jones is a cheat. what part of that don't you actually understand??? his career should have a black mark right through it.

    and he didn't fight the best at all. at least Joe fought in fights that he should have.

    Joe fought more times outside of "Whales" than he did inside. so why do you morons keep on saying this ****?? reality seems to be a problem for you lot over the water doesn't it.

    don't forget that one of Roy's 3 biggest wins is John Ruiz. don't forget that. :lol:
     
  2. kmac

    kmac On permanent vacation Full Member

    5,005
    15
    Jul 29, 2010
    and you're talking about jeff lacy. wow! i've been responding to assassin and atberry on different threads and the stupidity is starting to wear me out. i hope you guys can combine accounts so i only have to respond once. the new user name can be assberry.
     
  3. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    because we actually do proper drug testings over here. unlike in America.
     
  4. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    Lacy was a bigger win at the time. it's only now that the Yanks try and rip the win off to save face.

    no sportsmanship.

    ignorance, disrespect and arrogance in abundance though. :-(
     
  5. kmac

    kmac On permanent vacation Full Member

    5,005
    15
    Jul 29, 2010
    :lol: first off, coke supposedly takes only a few days to get out of your system. anyone could easily use between fights and not get caught. and secondly, your british drug testing is a joke. ask david price. (google david price and drug testing)
     
  6. kmac

    kmac On permanent vacation Full Member

    5,005
    15
    Jul 29, 2010
    :lol::lol: so say if calzaghe would have moved up to beat ruiz and win a belt at heavyweight, that fight, wouldn't have been as big as his win vs lacy?
     
  7. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    so that gives you ground to think Joe was taking whilst he was fighting??
     
  8. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    Joe wouldn't have moved up though, so it's completely irrelevant.

    it still doesn't change the fact that we are talking about the famous JOHN RUIZ though.
     
  9. kmac

    kmac On permanent vacation Full Member

    5,005
    15
    Jul 29, 2010
    the whole jones is a drug cheat argument is just to try to put him down to the level of the other inferior british fighters during his era. a british writer, Kieran Mulvaney, was the one to report that jones tested positive for andro vs hall. andro was something you could buy at the store during that time but it was illegal according to the ibf. these boards have been over this millions of times. the same exact scenario happened to enzo macranelli last year except what enzo took was illegal to the public. do you think enzo was a cheat for his entire career?
     
  10. kmac

    kmac On permanent vacation Full Member

    5,005
    15
    Jul 29, 2010
    exactly, joe wouldn't have moved up. john ruiz has wins over holyfield, golota, rahman (remember when he ko'ed lewis?) and is a f'ing heavyweight. he sucked to watch about as bad as joe but there's this thing in boxing called weight classes. it's why guys like joe don't move up to heavyweight.
     
  11. kmac

    kmac On permanent vacation Full Member

    5,005
    15
    Jul 29, 2010
    this is one of your weakest responses ever. even for you this sucks. i notice this is your only comment here. it's hard to explain this one away. i think you understand the deal.
     
  12. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    how can the British fighter be inferior to the American fighter when we have beat you a lot more through-out history than you have us??? :patsch

    if you will take the time to do your research, you'll see for yourself.

    not that you'd admit it though. you don't exactly have the characteristics of doing so.

    the banned substance that Enzo took wasn't even shown in the ingredients on the stuff he was taking.

    he proved that. so he wasn't to know that it was in protein shakes he was taking.
     
  13. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    it's why fighters Joe's size don't do you mean. unless you can give me a long list of fighters who have done so??

    didn't think so. plank.

    oh, and yeah, Joe was unwatchable just like Ruiz was. :patsch you've got nothing but bull**** have you?? i'm wasting my time with you, aren't i??

    bye, bye.
     
  14. kmac

    kmac On permanent vacation Full Member

    5,005
    15
    Jul 29, 2010
    :lol: why don't you check the heavyweight (or any weight) championship history of the sport and tell me if you see more americans or brits. the equivalent of this would be me arguing that ****** beiber is greater than the beatles or the stones.

    that enzo is such a trustworthy guy. if it were jones that had that "proof" you'd be calling BS. for you, it all depends on where someone is from. no real rational thoughts.
     
  15. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007
    First line was a typo ...Sue me ..Again you got proof he cheated in any other fight ? If not stop with the broken record .


    And look at this hypocrisy ! Jones didn't fight the best yet Joe fought the fights he should have :lol: :lol:

    And Joe could have fought 100 times outside of Whales still no one knew of him until Lacy ! And his win over Ruiz is better than 90 % better than most of Joe's like I said Lacy had to put him on the map :rofl

    **** out here with that amateur argument !