British fighters who have suffered the most painful defeats

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by FLINT ISLAND, Sep 15, 2008.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    The Soto decision was a disgrace.

    ''It was either a DQ or a point deduction, so I had no choice but to DQ him''

    Bearing in mind he was going to stop the fight for the fighter's wellbeing, why bother with the DQ - if I was the fighter I would have been embarrassed.
     
  2. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    Perhaps Cortez watched the tape of Hatton against Urango to learn for the signs of a Hatton clinch. This is the sort of homework a world class professional ref should do, just as a fighter would.
     
  3. trotter

    trotter Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,762
    2
    Apr 18, 2008
    No, he clearly tried to up the intensity though, as he wasn't winning bar a stoppage. In reality that meant wild lunges and no defence. He could've simply taken the decision by going into survival mode, but he went out on his shield.

    And whatever you think of Cortez splitting them you have to concede he was WAY too early at times - be fair, he was, he even broke them once when there was a foot of daylight - and then when he lets Hopkins get away with exactly the same thing... frankly, it stinks.

    I don't think he should have split them so much, and I think Hatton's tactics are perfectly within the rules, but it's open to interpretation like anything else.

    What should never happen is a ref goes in with a plan, that's just beyond belief. He should simply ref what he sees, but Cortez clearly was not going to let Hatton work inside ad had made his mind up to jump all over him before the fight. The Mayweathers did a number on him pre-fight, the dithering old twat that he is.

    Floyd won fair and square, all ends up, but Cortez was a ****ing joke.
     
  4. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    38
    Jan 7, 2005
    Still doesn't mean he would be correct in breaking the fighters before a clinch though does? He's not there to pre-judge what he thinks is going to happen, he's there to ref the fight as it unfolds.

    I've no complaints over the result but Cortez did not ref that fight (or his next 2) well at all.
     
  5. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    38
    Jan 7, 2005
    Please tell me that post is tongue in cheek.....:roll: ;)
     
  6. trotter

    trotter Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,762
    2
    Apr 18, 2008
    Absolutely, completely and utterly wrong.

    You referee what you see, to deliberately give yourself ideas of what a fighter may or may not do beforehand is simply prejudicing how you will ref the fight.

    You're fundamentally wrong on this one I'm afraid.
     
  7. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    I don't think they are perfectly within the rules. Holding is illegal and I'll direct you towards the Marquess of Queensberry rules that states no hugging is allowed. We've had this discussion before, but don't shoot the messenger.

    He was early at times. Preemptive clinch breaking.

    Hatton's work is open to interpretation if anything. How much of that is actually legit "inside fighting" I'm not sure. Or well, I'm quite sure, and at least 50% of it isn't. Holding and hitting is completely illegal, as bad as a rabbit punch, something else he isn't adverse to during his "inside work".

    I have no problem with inside fighting, but the greatest conveyors of this artform stand toe to toe with their guard up, and work angles. Holding is not an integral part of their gameplan.
     
  8. girv

    girv Gatekeeper Full Member

    1,003
    2
    Mar 6, 2007
    Recently -

    Michael Hunter vs Steve Molitor

    Michael Brodie vs Injin Chi rematch.

    Williams vs Klitchsko
     
  9. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    Maybe, but I'm just exploring explanations for Cortez' behavior. We can not rule out that he is a visionary at this stage.

    I think he did a good job in that fight overall. 9/10, 1 point deducted for preemptive clinch breaking which is not ideal.

    Calzaghe/Borenard I'd score him a 3/10 based on the inconsistency shown between the two fights

    Soto/Lorenzo 0/10
     
  10. scurlaruntings

    scurlaruntings ESB 2002 Club Full Member

    35,621
    12
    Jul 19, 2004
    Brodie vs Scott Harrison.
     
  11. FLINT ISLAND

    FLINT ISLAND PENYRHEOL Full Member

    8,568
    8
    May 4, 2008
    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    :huh
    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected
     
  12. scurlaruntings

    scurlaruntings ESB 2002 Club Full Member

    35,621
    12
    Jul 19, 2004
    He was exposed vs Jones. Some started to question his heart. Barrera was a fine boxer but he didnt take to well when things didnt go his way.
     
  13. Fat Joe

    Fat Joe Let's have it right Full Member

    6,255
    0
    Feb 12, 2008
    Scott Harrison beating the living **** out of McCullough, also I seem to remember Morales lamping **** out of McCullough but could not stop him.
     
  14. Claypole

    Claypole Boxing Addict banned

    7,071
    4
    Aug 4, 2007
    My favourite most painful defeat for a British fighter may well be Gary Lockett getting thumped by Pavlik. He well and truly had it coming.
     
  15. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    I think it was the arrogance of Lockett and the fact that he was very dismissive of 'proper' titles like the British and European.

    Also the fact that he didn't deserve his shot in the slightest :deal
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.