Broner beat Paulie relatively easy ...

I feel this.

 

you say that and then I bet you talked **** about Mayweather for fighting Guerrero who's a lightweight right?

You're a ****ing joke

 

like i'm some kind of Mayweather fan that talks about him a lot. no.

Guerrero was a solid fighter who wasn't worn, had fights at Welter before that gig and was pretty much the same size. i had no problem with the fight. i'm sick of Floyd cherry picking fighters, but i've grown used to that now considering he's done this throughout his career. but it was still a good win.

 

Floyd beats Cotto at 154 and some even felt Cotto won knowing he clearly lost. Trout beats a smaller Cotto and gets props. Floyd beats Guerrero, and Guerrero was never good enough for Floyd. Canelo treated like Jesus for beating Josesito Lopez, and GG gets props for beating nobody yet. See a pattern?

 

I watched the fight again myself.


And Broner was never in trouble, although he was outlanded in some of those rounds. On further review, I scored the fight 116-112 (8-4) for Broner. But I can see it 7-5 for Broner. If any of the cards were laughable it was the one that had it 7-5 Paulie.


People just don't know how to objectively score a fight involving a fighter they detest. It's as simple as that.

 

Look man, there is a clear pattern. We all know certain fighters don;t get credit for their wins. Let it go. You are never going to convince a bunch of know-nothing fans who are biased against certain fighters. It just isn't going to happen.

 

You have too much cultural victimisation going on here. Stop feeling like the world is against you, and against the fighter's you like. The world is a more colourful place this way. Independent observers (as well as the biased fans with agenda) alike feel that Broner is overrated and that he underperformed against a past prime Paulie M. Broner's leader, Floyd Mayweather, feels the same.

Broner is young and will have time to beat somebody good.

 

The pattern I see is your whining. You are too emotional, like a little girl. The world doesn't think the same way as you do. Get over it. You will hopefully encounter far more difficult issues in later life, and you can't just whine, whine and whine about them.

 

WTf are you talking about. Color isn't the issue, and nor was that even my point. Winning a fight isn't underperforming in my book. As long as you win, you can always impress in the next fight. There isn't a fighter on this planet past or present who is/was exciting in every fight. If they are, I bet their comp isn't good.

 

Why do you think that I'm whining?

 

The pattern is this. Even if you don't like a guy, be real. I'm real whether I like a guy or not. Winning a fight is all that matters, not impressing the fans. That happens naturally, and it won't happen in every fight. Those of you who got color out of my post probably have an agenda with what I posted. Color is not the issue at hand. This isn't directed at you Neck.

 

oh well that's very fair of you. All I ask for is no double standards :good