Broner can move up *two* weight classes but Bum-love-kin can't move up one?!?

I don't doubt that, he's not a 147lber so I'll give it to him and say that he moved up above where he's supposed to be fighting to fight Maidana and Malignaggi, he's really a 140 lb fighter.

Howerver, he's no lightweight or super featherweight, it was comical when he was fighting there the size advantage he had over his opponents.

 

Fans can be irrational. That's why they are called fans (short for fanatic). I have a problem with censorship. If someone says something I don't like, I either confront them or ignore them. Asking for someone to be banned because I don't like what they said seems kind of weak to me but that's just me.

 

Broner moves up two weight divisions and eventually loses to an extremely tough Maidana who he could've easily ducked for better options(money), yet still fights him as the fans demanded and is called a cowardly joke for losing.

GGG is a Middleweight demolishing over matched tomato cans(literally fighters he's going in against as a 100/1 favorite or 20/1 at the very least) and is calling out Welterweights for a big payday yet is hailed a modern day hero.

Common sense according to brainless losers.

 

At least Ward dominated the super six(a tournament very few gave him a shot against, especially when he entered with only 20 professional fights), is the lineal champion in his division and holds wins over Froch, Kessler, Abraham, Dawson, Bika, Miranda, Green and Rodriguez(A Light Heavyweight who Ward dominated and handed his first loss weighing in as a Super Middleweight).

Golovkin's biggest two wins are Murray and Geale.

 

"Quality of the forum"? lol What are the standards for maintaining the "quality of the forum"? I have seen certified trollers and outright racists not get banned and yet posters who have made what seemed to me to be innocuous posts get banned, which doesn't seem right to me. If the standards are arbitrary then they inherently are not fair. Anyway, that's the mods problem. No reason for me to be concerned about who should be banned and who shouldn't.

 

Why are these claimed to be great wins by the same people who **** on GGG's resume?

I mean you know you're reaching when you mention ****ing Green.

 

I personally don't mind either MVC or boxing master. They are both entertaining in their own way to me so, from my perspective, I have no problem with either one of them posting. I look at this site as a place to have some serious discussions about boxing but also to have some laughs.

 

Yes they had Broner the favorite, but was still a close favorite with many people picking Maidana to win this or at least give him pure hell/test him in the process. He sure as hell was no 100/1 favorite fully ready to rack up more highlight reel quality KOs.

 

If it's okay to mention guys GGG busted in as a 100/1 favorite against then Green qualifies. Hell, Shelby Pudwill deserves a mention too.

 

Scar is a good boy.

 

I don't think he does. He's basically a Willie Monroe kind of win, I wouldn't even mention that among GGG's best wins. If this your idea of a top opponent then GGG has a pretty freaking good resume lol...

 

This implies that he was drained.

 

You do know that Golovkin and Broner's bodies are built differently, right?