Broner> the overrated Valero

And we all know the main reason that you think that, don't we....

 

How the **** is he more powerful?

and as for being as tough, had a young DeMarco left a crater like that in Broners crown early on, Broner would have cried his way to the locker room

 

Valero would've knocked Broner's ****** ass the **** out.

 

T-Bag only sees skin colour

there is no point debating with him

 

Valero Ko1

 

Valero KO's all 135/140lbs no prob.
Too bad dude was insane in the membrane.

 

Valero was overrated? Maybe. But I can say the same about Broner. His fanboys are saying he's more exciting and better than Floyd because he knocks people out. In that sense Broner's overrated.

Valero's critics don't consider what he could've accomplished had his career been prolonged. They focus too much on what he never had. The guy showed improvements in the Demarco fight. Who knows what he could've done at 140...147. If today's Broner were to fight the Valero who beat Demarco, I believe it'd be like a mini version of Pac-Floyd. To me that's a toss-up fight. Either Broner cruises to a UD or Valero outworks him and knocks him out late.

 

I still think valero hits harder and he's also more slick. If you compare the punchstats, valero actually landed less power shots and was also hit less by demarco. Broner was more accurate but his work rate was lower. I think valero's chin is worse than broners though, cause he's been shaken by punches and dropped before.

 

He was over-rated, but you could tell DeMarco feared him much more than he did Broner, which is what done him in ironically vs Broner

 

I have to agree that Broner looked better against DeMarco and that I would favor him against Valero. That said Valero had a style that Broner hasn't faced. Exactly in the DeMarco fight he employed and in and out tactic that I think would bother Broner. The thing is that he is absolutely huge at 135 and very good which a deadly combination at that weight.

 

agree

 

Broner would kill Valero