I don't think he's improved. I think he was a great boxer then just like he is now. He just doesn't do as well against guys with real power. Nobody does, when it comes to that, but Broner isn't super hard to hit like a Mayweather and he's always going to be in danger from big punching guys.
He get's like this man, don't waste your breath, if you ain't "slick and black, you ain't ****" in his head
You think Demarco would have lasted that long if he tried to fight in the pocket with Valero? I think Valero is overrated but his power was for real. Styles makes fights, we saw how Broner struggled with PDL, what would have happened if a dynamic puncher like Valero tapped Broners chin? I'd favour Broner but its a toss up.
Yeah, I agree that Demarco has improved since the Valero fight. But still, I don't think it concretely proves Broner is easily better than what Valero was. I'll have to watch that Valero fight again, but from what I remember, he beat Demarco without even going into second gear. Apart from the horrible cut he suffered from an accidental elbow, I don't remember Demarco doing anything to trouble him.
yep. i hate where people do this as if its fact that it means one fighter beats another. Boxing does not work this way. Just ask Foreman if Boxing works this way.
Id love to see Broner fight just as aggressively with a vagina over his eyebrow and knock DeMarco out.. Valero was a quality operator. As crazy as he was out of the ring, he was inside it.. Broner would **** himself before he got in to the ring and his mini floyd style would get knocked out of him.. He'd be forced to fight Edwin's fight and lose.
Shut the **** up *****. You always got something slick to say about black boxers. Broner is the truth and is great for the sport and I'll be here to rub it in your ****ing face after every Broner fight. I know your black boxer hating ass can't stand it and it keeps you up at night. Broner a G.:deal Deal with it ****boy.:hi: