Broner vs mayweather @ 135

i refuse to vote as the choices are clearly a joke. but to answer the question seriously, money wins comfortably.

 

Floyd wins.

 

Who is the one ******* who picked Broner?

Also, anyone basing something off of what they saw with Floyd in comparison to what they think they'll see with Broner should quiet the **** down. No comparison.

 

Student cannot beat the teacher.. Hell Broner even tried a mini Dancing With the Stars routine with the coke head Eloy Perez mid-fight because Floyd did it.

This content is protected

cocaine cocaine cocaine

 

Floyd was just as offensive earlier in his career fighting opposition on Escobedo's level.....Floyd would often get the KO's earlier in his career as well....moving up contributed to hurting his hands, which at some point curbed Floyd's offense as well. Regardless.....Floyd was a better boxer than Broner at the same age in comparing the two. We have Castillo who Floyd struggled with...who was already a champion, in his prime....compared to Broner's complete domination over a very good former Olympian that never won a strap as a pro...OH.....who was also a lightweight fighting Broner who was a small welter weight. Broner is very good.....but let's keep things in the proper perspective. A lot of boxing fans get over excited and carried away with a dominant performance over champion level opposition......on a level playing field would be expected....but as great of a performance that was over Esco......there are many contraversial elements that took away from the win....Floyd arguably lost to JLC but he fought through a cracked rib....that added to his performance. Perspective...