Brook at #10, Ward at #2. How messed up is the Ring p4p list?

this thread is full of revolting posters

the ring is no more than a comic

p4p is now decided by the people - on forums

not just one opinionated biased journalist

imo p4p king is Gennady Golokin

mayweather aint even top 5 given inactivity and cherrypicking

 

:roflatsch Keep living in that fantasy land. Floyd is the best ever and that's that. 49-0, 26-0 and smashed JMM 12-0:deal

 

The last time Wladimir Klitschko was stopped you were still busy sucking you mother's breast. I swear you fan boys are re****ed.

Stupid has it occurred to you that Wladimir Klitschko have been heavyweight Champ longer than Golovkin have a pro. Add the fact that Golovkin is not even the Champion in his own division. That title belongs to Miguel Cotto.

Take your dumbass of the forum, you ret ard.

 

Acrtually no, he doesn't. Cotto does...

 

Don't know who Yamanaka is but I'd take Brook off aswell as GGG just based on resume and replace them with any 2 of Estrada, Canelo, Inoue, or Cotto.

 

I agree that they shouldn't really rank him yet due to not being active enough. I think with time however he will take the n#1 spot but that's a whole other story.

I have no idea why Wladimir is so low he's active, been undefeated since 2004 /world champion / one of the most title defenses in history of hw boxing I Mean come on haha.

 

How is this logic worse than looking at resumes of some fighters who had good wins 5-10 years ago but have been cherry picking since then ?

Somebody said that Cotto's resume is better than Golovkin's. How so ? He had 3 losses in the last 6 years, and his best wins were over 1-legged Martinez and 1-eyed Margarito.

 

Does Ward have the raw talent to be number 1 or 2? Absolutely. Is he deserving on recent fights? Not really.

Revamping the p4p list purely on talent is a better judge imo. Much more refreshing.

 

Cotto has a better resume because in a tuneup fight Cotto destroyed GGGS best win, and GGGs second best win could only pull a close loss vs a Martinez Cotto destroyed, if he beat Canelo which I don't believe so it will be undeniable.

GGG being the most avoided boxer is the biggest myth in boxing right now, for all the **** Ward takes he's younger than GGG, has around the same # of fights, and a vastly better resume/accomplishments.

 

Well Ward is the 2nd best fighter in the world behind Gonzalez so it's pretty accurate. Brook I agree shouldn't be even top 30

 

That's outrageous. He's easily top 30. He's undefeated and beat Porter who was highly regarded after putting it on Alexander.

 

Yeah he's undefeated so what? Wlad Klitsch and Manny have loses, doesn't mean a thing, it's what they do in the grand scheme of things...also beating Porter alone doesn't stand for much at all. Brook is a worse tin can fighter than Golovkin, Golovkin's resume compared to Brook's is amazing, and anyone with a brain knows Golovkin's resume is terrible for a supposedly "elite" boxer.

 

Name 30

 

Brook in the top 10 who comes up with that ****?

 

GGG too high, Brook is not p4p yet.