Brook Is better than Queen Khan in almost Every Department

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Badaman, Oct 18, 2015.


  1. Badaman

    Badaman Member Full Member

    314
    1
    Oct 9, 2015
    Power: Brook
    Size: Brook
    Chin: Brook
    Speed: Khan
    Accuracy: Brook
    Timing: Brook
    Footwork: Brook
    Defence: Brook
    Jab: Brook
    Offense: Brook
    Ring IQ: Brook

    Press releases: Khan
    Trashtalking: Khan
    Delusion: Khan
     
  2. DoubleEdge

    DoubleEdge The king of Kings banned

    5,654
    3
    Jul 2, 2011
    You forgot

    Propaganda; Khan
    Running over pedestrians: Khan
    Buying strippers: Khan
     
  3. beachie17

    beachie17 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,849
    2
    Jun 4, 2014
    Khan puts his shots together better and has a greater variety of shots than Brook too. Khan has a pretty good jab himself so I would pick either Brook or Khan as the best jab.
     
  4. VG_Addict

    VG_Addict Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,727
    3,935
    Jun 13, 2012
    What makes Khan's jab good?
     
  5. boxingcrazy

    boxingcrazy Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,239
    52
    Jul 3, 2010
    you forgot:

    w anking on camera: khan
    getting caught doing things in toilets: brook
     
  6. Boo

    Boo Active Member Full Member

    789
    8
    Dec 8, 2012
    I'd put it equal on jab, both have quality
     
  7. DoubleEdge

    DoubleEdge The king of Kings banned

    5,654
    3
    Jul 2, 2011
    Brook puts more power into his jabs, but agree both have good jabs.

    Brook uses it more to tee up hooks, while khan uses it to keep range at a distance
     
  8. beachie17

    beachie17 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,849
    2
    Jun 4, 2014
    I mean if you have to ask that then you clearly haven't watched any of his fights, particularly recent ones. When fighters can win fights behind the jab at a good level then they clearly have a good jab.
     
  9. beachie17

    beachie17 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,849
    2
    Jun 4, 2014
    Yeah strangely I agree with you, they definitely use it for different things but I feel like it is effective for both, hence why I cant really say decisively that one has a greater jab than the other.
     
  10. Solaris

    Solaris Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    11,136
    5
    Nov 7, 2009
    Khan's jab is rubbish against anyone with power. It is effective against smaller men in order to keep them at range.
     
  11. rowedav

    rowedav He Glassed Me Full Member

    1,328
    0
    Sep 8, 2009
    Running over pedestrians:lol:
     
  12. DoubleEdge

    DoubleEdge The king of Kings banned

    5,654
    3
    Jul 2, 2011
    Yeah it's definitely effective for both, and both methods of utilising the jab will do enough to pepper their opponents face and make them think twice keeping them at bay.

    However like the op's conclusion brook trumps kahn, on timing, accuracy and power amongst others.

    He's also got a higher ring iq then Khan.

    This is how I come to conclusion that there would be no other winner than brook if khan ever had the cojones to get in the ring with him.
     
  13. Brixton Bomber

    Brixton Bomber Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    21,934
    6,105
    Sep 21, 2013
    Definitely better in the taking it in the 'arris department.
     
  14. Bensub

    Bensub Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,527
    1,051
    Jan 17, 2015
    Simply fact is there must be a reason khan keeps ducking the fight. He says it would be an easy fight, so take it. Sell out wembley, his biggest payday, world title at welterweight. Don't see anything on why he wouldn't unless he knows brook connects and night night.
     
  15. Badaman

    Badaman Member Full Member

    314
    1
    Oct 9, 2015
    Added to the list :good